Question about thunar-volman.

[sergiocmailbox-xfce at yahoo.com.br]

--- Em seg, 28/5/12, Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert at googlemail.com> escreveu:

> De: Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert at googlemail.com>
> Assunto: Re: Question about thunar-volman.
> Para: xfce at xfce.org
> Data: Segunda-feira, 28 de Maio de 2012, 13:43
> Am Montag, den 28.05.2012, 04:22
> -0700 schrieb
> sergiocmailbox-xfce at yahoo.com.br:
> > Hi.
> > I had posted with a wrong email address so I'll quote
> my post and add
> > further observations:
> > "I installed Fedora 17 from a minimal system and then
> Xfce4.10 from
> > Kevin Fenzi's repo. I'm using LXDM as the login
> manager.
> > Neither Thunar nor thunar-volman brought gvfs
> automatically as a
> > dependency.
> 
> I think this is correct because strictly speaking neither of
> them
> depends on gvfs. For weak dependencies we use yum-groups and
> I have just
> added gvfs to the comps files that control these groups [1].
> The change
> should become active in 2-3 days when all mirrors have
> synced.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Christoph
> 
> [1] http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=comps.git;a=commitdiff;h=93744e3b
>

Sure, I completely agree (specially in fedora that doesn't have separate 'required' and 'optional' dependencies).