ANN: terminal version 0.4.0 released
Yves-Alexis Perez
corsac at debian.org
Mon Jul 20 23:30:08 CEST 2009
On lun, 2009-07-20 at 23:24 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> > 0.4.0 after 0.2.99.1 ? Isn't it a bit weird? Shouldn't it be 0.3.0?
>
> It's 0.4.0 because this introduces a new stable cycle. Our release
> model document recommends to use even minor versions for stable
> releases. I know, the document isn't followed strictly yet, but it can
> already be used as a reference to make things more consistent.
I have no problem with 0.4.0 but then the rc should have been numbered
0.3.90 -> 0.3.99.1. I was just seeking for confirmation that it wasn't
a mistake (and I wouldn't have to add an epoch later for the
packaging :) )
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20090720/9b8c3e3e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Xfce
mailing list