problem to configure a dsl connection

galette at tin.it galette at tin.it
Sat Jun 14 12:34:50 CEST 2008


Dear all
I've a strange problem trying to configure a directly ethernet 
modem adsl connection, a connection that do not pass through a router ( 
a so called "dsl connection")
I can't find a tool to create it. I'm new 
of Xfce. I usually use a router connection but I have to test the 
router for some problems and I need a dsl connection, for now
What tool 
can I use to  ?
Thanks 
Alessia

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: xfce-
request at xfce.org
>Data: 14-giu-2008 12.20 AM
>A: <xfce at xfce.org>
>Ogg: 
Xfce Digest, Vol 55, Issue 11
>
>Send Xfce mailing list submissions to
>	xfce at xfce.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, 
visit
>	http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
>or, via email, 
send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	xfce-request at xfce.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	xfce-owner at xfce.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Xfce digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. 
xrandr and session (Jean-Christophe)
>   2. Re: NetworkManager or Wifi-
Radar? (Jean-Christophe)
>   3. Re: NetworkManager or Wifi-Radar? (Greg 
Folkert)
>   4. Re: xrandr and session (Brian J. Tarricone)
>   5. Re: 
NetworkManager or Wifi-Radar? (Grant McWilliams)
>   6. OT: suid 
programs vs. sudo access (Re: NetworkManager or
>      Wifi-Radar?) 
(Brian J. Tarricone)
>   7. Re: NetworkManager or Wifi-Radar? (Greg 
Folkert)
>   8. Re: NetworkManager or Wifi-Radar? (Grant McWilliams)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:52:29 +0200
>From: Jean-
Christophe <jc.sid at free.fr>
>Subject: xrandr and session
>To: xfce at xfce.
org
>Message-ID: <4852516D.4000200 at free.fr>
>Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Hello to all.
>Here is my problem:
>I've got a laptop, and when I plug a screen on it, I use xrandr to 
>switch my resolutions. This works fine.
>But xfce doesn't reconize it, 
and I have then my 800x480 desktop 
>(eeepc...) shown on my 17" 
configured on 1600x1200 and all the other 
>parts are blank. I can move 
my cursor on it but xfce refuses to display 
>anything there.
>One 
solution I found is to do: 'killall xfwm4 & xfwm4'. Then xfce 
>reconizes my desktops but xfwm isn't launched with my user's 
preferences 
>and can't be configured.
>How can I make xfce reconize my 
xrandr changes?
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:31:01 +0200
>From: Jean-Christophe <jc.
sid at free.fr>
>Subject: Re: NetworkManager or Wifi-Radar?
>To: Xfce at xfce.
org
>Message-ID: <48526885.2050204 at free.fr>
>Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>I found this thread and I could 
suggest another soft: wpa_gui, which is 
>the most highly capable I 
found.
>I made a hotkey launching 'sudo wpa_gui' (it must be launched 
as root) 
>and added 'ALL     ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/sbin/wpa_gui' to 
sudoers with visudo.
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:49:52 -0400
>From: Greg Folkert 
<greg at gregfolkert.net>
>Subject: Re: NetworkManager or Wifi-Radar?
>To: 
xfce at xfce.org
>Message-ID: <1213364992.29811.1.camel at princess.
gregfolkert.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>On 
Fri, 2008-06-13 at 14:31 +0200, Jean-Christophe wrote:
>> I found this 
thread and I could suggest another soft: wpa_gui, which is 
>> the most 
highly capable I found.
>> I made a hotkey launching 'sudo wpa_gui' (it 
must be launched as root) 
>> and added 'ALL     ALL=NOPASSWD: 
/usr/sbin/wpa_gui' to sudoers with visudo.
>
>I know many people hate 
SUID programs... but rather than make a grievous
>SUDOERS ENTRY like 
that...
>
>Why not make the program SUID and owned by root? Or at least 
GUID and
>proper groups memberships for the running user.
>-- 
>greg at gregfolkert.net
>PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
>Fingerprint: 
E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0  2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
>Alternate 
Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74  E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
>Alternate 
Fingerprint: 455F E104 22CA  29C4 933F 9505 2B79 2AB2
>-------------- 
next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: 
not available
>Type: application/pgp-signature
>Size: 197 bytes
>Desc: 
This is a digitally signed message part
>Url : http://foo-projects.
org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20080613/3d05995c/attachment-0001.bin
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 
10:48:56 -0700
>From: "Brian J. Tarricone" <bjt23 at cornell.edu>
>Subject: Re: xrandr and session
>To: jc.sid at free.fr, XFCE general 
discussion list <xfce at xfce.org>
>Message-ID: <4852B308.5050500 at cornell.
edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Jean-Christophe wrote:
>> Hello to all.
>> Here is my problem:
>> I've 
got a laptop, and when I plug a screen on it, I use xrandr to 
>> 
switch my resolutions. This works fine.
>> But xfce doesn't reconize 
it, and I have then my 800x480 desktop 
>> (eeepc...) shown on my 17" 
configured on 1600x1200 and all the other 
>> parts are blank. I can 
move my cursor on it but xfce refuses to display 
>> anything there.
>> 
One solution I found is to do: 'killall xfwm4 & xfwm4'. Then xfce 
>> 
reconizes my desktops but xfwm isn't launched with my user's 
preferences 
>> and can't be configured.
>> How can I make xfce 
reconize my xrandr changes?
>
>You can't -- Xfce doesn't support the 
new 1.2 version of xrandr. 
>There's support in xfdesktop in SVN trunk, 
but it requires gtk 2.13 
>(which I wouldn't recommend installing); not 
sure what plans the other 
>devs have for their modules (xfwm4, xfce4-
panel, mainly).
>
>	-brian
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:54:03 -0700
>From: "Grant 
McWilliams" <grantmasterflash at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: NetworkManager 
or Wifi-Radar?
>To: "XFCE general discussion list" <xfce at xfce.org>
>Message-ID:
>	<ed123fa30806131054t1b937f0atca4f4c1af6019881 at mail.gmail.
com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>gag, cough 
sputter. An SUID program is better than a SUDO entry???? I'm
>going to 
use this thread for my Linux Host System Security class on Tuesday!
>
>Grant
>
>
>
>On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Greg Folkert 
<greg at gregfolkert.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 14:31 +0200, 
Jean-Christophe wrote:
>> > I found this thread and I could suggest 
another soft: wpa_gui, which is
>> > the most highly capable I found.
>> > I made a hotkey launching 'sudo wpa_gui' (it must be launched as 
root)
>> > and added 'ALL     ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/sbin/wpa_gui' to 
sudoers with
>> visudo.
>>
>> I know many people hate SUID programs... 
but rather than make a grievous
>> SUDOERS ENTRY like that...
>>
>> Why 
not make the program SUID and owned by root? Or at least GUID and
>> 
proper groups memberships for the running user.
>> --
>> 
greg at gregfolkert.net
>> PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
>> 
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0  2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
>> 
Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74  E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
>> 
Alternate Fingerprint: 455F E104 22CA  29C4 933F 9505 2B79 2AB2
>>
>> 
_______________________________________________
>> Xfce mailing list
>> 
Xfce at xfce.org
>> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
>> http:
//www.xfce.org
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Some people, when confronted with a 
problem, think "I know, I'll use
>Windows."
>Now they have two 
problems.
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment 
was scrubbed...
>URL: http://foo-projects.
org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20080613/6a6125db/attachment-0001.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 
12:02:26 -0700
>From: "Brian J. Tarricone" <bjt23 at cornell.edu>
>Subject: OT: suid programs vs. sudo access (Re: NetworkManager or
>	
Wifi-Radar?)
>To: XFCE general discussion list <xfce at xfce.org>
>Message-
ID: <4852C442.4070802 at cornell.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Grant McWilliams wrote:
>> gag, 
cough sputter. An SUID program is better than a SUDO entry???? I'm
>> 
going to use this thread for my Linux Host System Security class on 
Tuesday!
>
>It can be, if done properly.  A sudo entry to run a 
particular app as 
>root password-less forces you to rely on sudo 
itself being well behaved 
>and secure.
>
>A binary with perms set to -
rwsr-x--- and ownership set to root:foo (and 
>put users allowed to run 
it in group foo) only relies on the OS's 
>built-in facilities and is 
certainly no less secure than a password-less 
>sudo entry.  I'd argue 
it's more secure.
>
>Though really, the security concerns of using suid 
vs. sudo are dwarfed 
>by those of running a GUI app as root.  wpa_gui 
uses Qt, right?  Care to 
>audit all of Qt for security issues?
>
>	-
brian
>
>> 
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Greg Folkert 
<greg at gregfolkert.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 14:31 
+0200, Jean-Christophe wrote:
>>>> I found this thread and I could 
suggest another soft: wpa_gui, which is
>>>> the most highly capable I 
found.
>>>> I made a hotkey launching 'sudo wpa_gui' (it must be 
launched as root)
>>>> and added 'ALL     ALL=NOPASSWD: 
/usr/sbin/wpa_gui' to sudoers with
>>> visudo.
>>>
>>> I know many 
people hate SUID programs... but rather than make a grievous
>>> 
SUDOERS ENTRY like that...
>>>
>>> Why not make the program SUID and 
owned by root? Or at least GUID and
>>> proper groups memberships for 
the running user.
>>> --
>>> greg at gregfolkert.net
>>> PGP key 
1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
>>> Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0  
2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
>>> Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74  
E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
>>> Alternate Fingerprint: 455F E104 22CA  
29C4 933F 9505 2B79 2AB2
>>>
>>> 
_______________________________________________
>>> Xfce mailing list
>>> Xfce at xfce.org
>>> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
>>> 
http://www.xfce.org
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xfce mailing 
list
>> Xfce at xfce.org
>> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
>> http://www.xfce.org
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 
7
>Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:21:48 -0400
>From: Greg Folkert 
<greg at gregfolkert.net>
>Subject: Re: NetworkManager or Wifi-Radar?
>To: 
XFCE general discussion list <xfce at xfce.org>
>Message-ID: <1213388508.
30048.8.camel at princess.gregfolkert.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; 
charset="us-ascii"
>
>On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:54 -0700, Grant 
McWilliams wrote:
>> gag, cough sputter. An SUID program is better than 
a SUDO entry????
>> I'm going to use this thread for my Linux Host 
System Security class
>> on Tuesday!
>> 
>> Grant
>
>Have fun pointing 
out the whole reliance on SUDO and other many
>mechanisms. Shoe-horning 
in another program named that with a
>possibility to replace the Binary 
regardless of it being the right one.
>and doing its bad work.
>
>At 
least with the proper groups and proper right assigned to them, you;d
>get MUCH less collateral damage.
>
>Don't forget that, SUID/GUID 
programs have their place, this may just be
>one of them.
>
>Come on, 
there are always two sides to this stuff. There are other
>alternatives 
as well.
>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Greg Folkert 
<greg at gregfolkert.net>
>> wrote:
>>         On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 14:31 
+0200, Jean-Christophe wrote:
>>         > I found this thread and I 
could suggest another soft:
>>         wpa_gui, which is
>>         > 
the most highly capable I found.
>>         > I made a hotkey launching 
'sudo wpa_gui' (it must be
>>         launched as root)
>>         > 
and added 'ALL     ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/sbin/wpa_gui' to
>>         
sudoers with visudo.
>>         
>>         
>>         I know many 
people hate SUID programs... but rather than make
>>         a grievous
>>         SUDOERS ENTRY like that...
>>         
>>         Why not 
make the program SUID and owned by root? Or at least
>>         GUID 
and
>>         proper groups memberships for the running user.
>
>-- 
>greg at gregfolkert.net
>PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
>Fingerprint: 
E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0  2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
>Alternate 
Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74  E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
>Alternate 
Fingerprint: 455F E104 22CA  29C4 933F 9505 2B79 2AB2
>-------------- 
next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: 
not available
>Type: application/pgp-signature
>Size: 197 bytes
>Desc: 
This is a digitally signed message part
>Url : http://foo-projects.
org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20080613/c3cffa2f/attachment-0001.bin
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 8
>Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 
15:20:03 -0700
>From: "Grant McWilliams" <grantmasterflash at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: NetworkManager or Wifi-Radar?
>To: "XFCE general 
discussion list" <xfce at xfce.org>
>Message-ID:
>	
<ed123fa30806131520y233dc43l313ac795662ab092 at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-
Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>>
>>
>> Have fun pointing out 
the whole reliance on SUDO and other many
>> mechanisms. Shoe-horning 
in another program named that with a
>> possibility to replace the 
Binary regardless of it being the right one.
>> and doing its bad work.
>>
>> At least with the proper groups and proper right assigned to 
them, you;d
>> get MUCH less collateral damage.
>>
>> Don't forget 
that, SUID/GUID programs have their place, this may just be
>> one of 
them.
>>
>> Come on, there are always two sides to this stuff. There 
are other
>> alternatives as well.
>
>
>:-) As much as I dislike SUDO 
at least you have more control and logging
>over what the user does. At 
least you get to decide WHO gets to execute
>wpa_gui as root. With SUID 
you have nothing, everyone IS root for that app
>for all practical 
purposes. SUID needs to go away. I think on my servers I
>wittle it 
down to about 9 SUID/SGID binaries left. When I get SELinux policy
>modules created for them they'll be gone.
>
>I realize that only one 
major disto and it's community variant uses SELinux
>so that's not a 
solution for everyone. I don't know enough about AppArmor to
>know if 
it could provide an SUID like Domain Transition decision policy.
>
>If 
an SELinux policy was created for wpa_gui that had a wpa_gui_exec_t
>domain and a wpa_gui_t domain that would have permissions to the 
relevant
>network interfaces and sockets all you'd need is an allow 
policy to allow
>wpa_gui_exec_t to transit to wpa_gui_t and allow 
unconfined_t execute
>permissions. The whole thing could be constrained 
so that if it were
>exploited it could only be used to edit wpa 
settings and nothing more. I
>don't know that much about wpa_gui but if 
it reads files then it could be
>forced to read files that it shouldn't 
and if it's SUID those files could be
>ANY.
>
>I'm sure this 
functionality is also in AppArmor so it would work in
>Mandrake, 
Ubuntu, Sun Linux, and SuSE. I don't use most of those so I'm just
>guessing.
>
>Grant
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML 
attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: http://foo-projects.
org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20080613/556923b1/attachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xfce mailing list
>Xfce at xfce.org
>http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
>
>End of 
Xfce Digest, Vol 55, Issue 11
>************************************
>





More information about the Xfce mailing list