jacobidiego at gmail.com
Sun Jul 13 07:39:46 CEST 2008
I just wonder why xfwm4 is different of Metacity.
I have found that both takes mostly the same amount of RAM, and does seems
to be really faster.
They both have mostly the same theme functionalities but are not compatible
due to language conventions.
xfwm4 doesnt have any minimizing animation or any other.
I am using openbox now, because it is much faster than xfwm4, more easy to
configure with obconf, and have a great number of themes which integrates
well, and also it haves some minimum animation when minimizing apps.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Xfce