xfce4 battery plugin gives wrong infomation with linux kernel 2.6.24
Yves-Alexis Perez
corsac at debian.org
Wed Feb 20 08:20:47 CET 2008
On mar, 2008-02-19 at 19:07 -0500, Erik Harrison wrote:
> > Setting up powermgmt-base (1.30) ...
>
> Sounds like a winner.
----%<----
powermgmt-base (1.30) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control: bump standards-version (no changes).
* Use /sbin/MAKEDEV rather than /dev/MAKEDEV. (closes: Bug#449049)
-- Chris Hanson <cph at debian.org> Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:43:30 -0500
---->%----
I don't think so.
Yesterday, some people complained in #xfce that battery plugin wasn't
working (using sysfs patch). He had no /sys/class/power_supply/AC but
had a /sys/class/power_supply/ACAD. This confused the battery plugin
(but not the 28% thingy) so I thought it could be a good idea to check
for ACAD too, but looking on google it seems that it's not really
frequent (at all). Can people with laptop check
their /sys/class/power_supply and report if they have AC or ACAD (with
the output of uname -a)?
I'd really like to find the problem with the battery plugin and Nick
seems busy atm.
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20080220/3d39d56b/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Xfce
mailing list