Desktop memory usage
Biju Chacko
botsie at xfce.org
Thu Sep 14 10:49:47 CEST 2006
Hi,
Interesting article, especially in the context of the recent discussion on
panel plugins.
-- b
--8<----
http://ktown.kde.org/~seli/memory/
This was actually supposed to be a follow-up to my tests of startup
performance of various desktop environments, primarily KDE of course :).
In fact I even did most of the benchmarks some time after the startup
ones, but, alas, I'm much better at writing things that computers are
supposed to read than at writing things that people will read :-/ (some
volunteer to write good user documentation for KWin's window specific
settings, BTW ;) ?) I even meant to make a somewhat more extensive
analysis of the numbers, but having never found time to write that, I
decided I should publish at least a shorter variant with all the numbers
and some conclusions. You can do your own analyses of the numbers if you
will.
These memory benchmarks are meant to measure various cases of desktop
configuration and compare KDE to some other desktop environments.
Specifically, I compared against Xfce 4.2.2 (as shipped with SUSE Linux
10.0) as the so-called lightweight desktop, WindowMaker 0.92.0 as a plain
window manager and GNOME. GNOME, built using GARNOME, was originally
version 2.12.2, later redoing it with 2.14.0 (without actually measuring
noticeable difference in these specific cases, despite 2.14 release notes
claiming performance improvements). As I no longer have the same setup I
cannot redo it with the very recent 2.16 unfortunately. Simply consider
this to be a bit old. The others are for comparison anyway :). KDE itself
was KDE 3.5.2 with my performance patches, all of which are already
upstream by now.
--8<----
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
More information about the Xfce
mailing list