Wiki documentation

[Brian J. Tarricone]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 1/18/2006 1:57 PM, Andrew Conkling wrote:

> I'd really be interested in figuring out a good way to get the
> official docs wiki-fied

I don't really see how this is a positive step.  How is this better than
including the docs in docbook format with the packages themselves?  The
only place the documentation is really lacking, IMHO, is in the
development tree, which will be fixed up before 4.4 (same as what
happened for 4.1->4.2).

Would this mean ditching the documentation supplied with the package
that gets installed to the user's HD?  If so, I'm firmly against this.
If not, how do we keep the two in sync?

> Oh, and one more thing: I'm not sure how this works with a wiki, but
> the title is listed in the browser as "XFce wiki", but this should be
> changed to "Xfce wiki".  (Right?)  The administrators page (whose URL
> I can't seem to access at the moment, since the site isn't responding)
> doesn't list anyone.

Yeah, I'm not sure who admins the wiki; it's been incorrect like that
for quite a while.

	-b

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFDzr6/6XyW6VEeAnsRAsrzAKCgc1lQSFb0pF3pKNPupFPjqvJ01wCgsDsD
SkMNWSYpSyiMruwirRmvGdI=
=19+F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----