Panel hidden

[Tine Brumec]

On 4/3/06, Andrew Conkling <andrew.conkling at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/3/06, Matthieu Estrade <mestrade at apache.org> wrote:
> > Jasper Huijsmans wrote:
> > >It's good to have an indication of the location and size of the panel,
> > >otherwise there is no distinction between a hidden panel and no panel
> at
> > >all. It was also easier to implement ;-)
> >
> > Yes it's good, but usually, this panel doesn't move a lot :) and we have
> > enough memory to know where we put the panel :)
>
> Hmm, maybe this could be made more specific: what about completely
> hiding the panel if it takes the full width of the screen?  Memory
> seems to do the trick when it goes across the entire top/bottom, but
> an indication would do very nicely when it is only 100px across in an
> arbitrary position. ;)





What about showing the panel  when one touches the screen edge with the
panel? Oh... more specific: ...even when NOT explicitly touching the panel?
This seems practical, noone has (probably) a panel 100px wide, unless he has
a screen resolution of 100 by 150.
Oh... this seems to be obligatory now... :)

Ti e.

_______________________________________________
> Xfce mailing list
> Xfce at xfce.org
> http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
> http://www.xfce.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20060403/f9edcd3b/attachment.html>