For a PII - XFCE or XFCE 4.2?

[Shadow Rage]

should work fine.


On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 21:12:41 -0600, LostSon <lostson at lostsonsvault.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 19:03 -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> >
> > >> Did an HD Install of Knoppix 3.6 to an HP Vectra VL (PII 266, 64 megs
> >                                                              ^^^
> >
> > > how fast is your PII?  i've run 4.1 during the dev cycle on a PII 266MHz,
> > > and it worked beautifully.  i don't have the machine anymore (it was my
> > > work box at my old job), but i don't think any appreciable amount of
> > > "overhead" has been added in the past 3 months.
> >
> >    I've run xfce on everything from plain ol' pentiums to the athlon xp
> > 3200+. Since it's so much lighter and faster than either KDE or Gnome I've
> > never noticed a problem that I could ascribe to xfce and not the slow box
> > with limited RAM.
> >
> >    I've got xfce-4.0 running on my Toshiba Portege; a 300MHz Pentium-MMX
> > which I upgraded from 64M RAM to the maximum of 96M. Runs just fine.
> >
> > Rich
> 
> Hello
>  I run it a pII with 128 mb of ram and its smooth so i would see no
> problem there at all
> >
> --
> LostSon <lostson at lostsonsvault.org>
> Wolf Linux
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce mailing list
> Xfce at xfce.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
> http://www.xfce.org
> 
> 
>