Gnome-terminal error in xfce

[John Shane]

I loaded MGT. You're right.  It is nice. (Although I couldn't find a
transparent background feature - did I miss that?)

But, if Gnome and gnome-terminal is problem prone, why is
multi-gnome-terminal any different?  That's not a meant to be a
challenge.  I'm just trying to learn how all this works.  I started
using Sylpheed as a mail client because it made similar claims to Xfce,
fast and lean (plus it comes the closest I've seen to the flexibility of
Pegasus Mail that I abandoned back in Windows land). Sylpheed is indeed
quick.  I like it.  So I'm starting to get the picture, being GTK-based
and maybe especially GTK2 is a potentially good feature when evaluating
a program.  But when I google for "GTK2 + term" I only come up with
Gnome-terminal.  Meanwhile I'm enjoying the great range of choices that
we have in the Open Source environment.  js

On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:42:32 -0500
Ben Hall <bhall-www at linuxgruven.ca> wrote:

> 
> multi-gnome-terminal is pretty good.  It's a GTK 1.x app.  It's fast,
> it has font/bg/etc. settings.
> 
> Ben
> 
> >
> > I will probably switch to a different terminal, Konsole maybe.
> > Gnome-terminal was just easy to set fonts, background etc and
> > generally more esthetically pleasing than Xterm. John
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce mailing list
> Xfce at xfce.org
> http://lunar-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
> http://www.xfce.org
>