Odd problem using xfwm4.0.3 and GnuCash

[Olivier Fourdan]

John,

Can you try http://www.xfce.org/archive/test/xfwm4-4.0.4-cvs.tar.gz ?

Cheers,
Olivier.

On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 21:50, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> I've updated the bug report with the following comment:
> 
> 
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > Search window has WM_TRANSIENT_FOR set to the root window, which means
> > "transient for group" as mentionned by the EWMH standard in the quote
> > I sent by email to John.
> > 
> > So it basically means that the Search window should be treated as a
> > transient to all windows of the same group. Since xfwm4 places
> > transient on top of their parents, then the Search window is rightly
> > placed on top of all other windows of the same group, including the
> > invoice window.
> > 
> > The obvious solution is to remove the WM_TRANSIENT_FOR property on the
> > Search window in gnucash.
> > 
> > PS: The fact that other WM don't implement this doesn't mean xfwm4 is
> > broken, nor behaving "irradically".
> 
> Cheers,
> Olivier.
> 
> On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 17:40, John Pettigrew wrote:
> > In a previous message, Olivier Fourdan <fourdan at xfce.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Ok, I took some time digging into it and what you see is the normal expected
> > > behaviour.
> > > 
> > > Let me try to explain (so you can pass that info the the gnucash people)
> > 
> > OK, I've posted your reply back on the GnuCash bugzilla, and got the following
> > reply.
> > 
> > Derek Atkens wrote:
> > > Uh, the find window is a top-level window, just like the invoice and
> > > customer windows.  It is not a transient window.  It has no parent.
> > > 
> > > Can you get the FXce guys into this conversation, because I've never
> > > seen this behavior with any other windowmanager, and it's clearly the
> > > window manager that's behaving irradically.  You're welcome to play
> > > with the glade settings of search.glade to see if there is something I
> > > have set incorrectly....  But it all looks right to me.
> > 
> > I am not familiar with Glade and so can't play with this myself without
> > guidance, but it sounds like Derek wants to pass the buck back to xfwm4.
> > 
> > Derek has suggested that xfwm4 devs might get involved directly so I'll
> > include the bugzilla URL: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134100
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > John
-- 
 - Olivier Fourdan - fourdan at xfce.org - http://www.xfce.org -