Ok, I know this was touched on before..

[hugh d fegely]

yeah, I just disabled the icon box again, too..

Other than using IceWM with Gnome (instead of Saw-whateveritisthisweek) I haven't played with that one or Blackbox... but I understand both of them are lightweight..


Pat Martin <pmartin at patm.net> had stated the obvious on Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:54:02 -0700 (PDT) when they said:

> 
> Except on the reverse side of this IceWM offers this functionality yet is
> extremely light. Yes it is an application issue but there are alot of
> applications out there that have said issue. I don't use iconbox for that
> reason.
> 
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Biju Chacko wrote:
> >
> > > You should realise that each additional line of code that we add
> > > produces one more place where a bug could occur. Increasing the size of
> > > the code just makes it more difficult to maintain.
> >
> > 	You can look at Win2K for a very good example of this.  There's
> > about 4 times as much code in the OS part of Win2K than in all of the OS,
> > apps and add-ons in any Linux distribution.
> >
> > --
> > Joe "Kuramarujo" Klemmer
> > Hoping to make Ozeki someday but likely not to get beyond Juryo.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xfce mailing list
> > Xfce at xfce.org
> > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce mailing list
> Xfce at xfce.org
> http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce