Current source for xfce4

[edscott wilson garcia]

El dom, 08-06-2003 a las 11:19, Jasper Huijsmans escribió:
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 10:14:00 -0600
> Collins Richey <erichey2 at attbi.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > > 
> > > If you show us the error messages, we can try to help. Xffm is not
> > > absolutely required, but it would be nice to know why it doesn't
> > > work for you.
> > > 
> > 
> > Sorry, I hit send too soon.  With either ./configure or ./autogen.sh,
> > I always get
> > 
> > checking for dbh-1.0 >= 1.0... Package dbh-1.0 was not found in the
> > pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory
> > containing`dbh-1.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> > No package 'dbh-1.0' found
> > 
> > configure: error: Library requirements (dbh-1.0 >= 1.0) not met;
> > consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your
> > libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them.
> > 
> > Even though dbh-1.0 is installed, I don't find a dbh-1.0.pc anywhere.
> > 
> 
> Hmm, I believe you're libdbh may be too old. Did you use the latest
> version?
> 
> Edscott, what is the required version of libdbh? If not all versions
> work, we have to put that somewhere on the website and in the release
> notes.

If you are to compile from source, the requirement is >= 1.0-14, since
pkgconfig will look for the 1-0-14 .pc file. If you install a binary and
have *any* dbh version in the library path xffm will work fine. 

Edscott

> 
> 	Jasper
> 
> 
> 
> > Thanks,
> > -- 
> > Collins Richey - Denver Area
> > gentoo stable - ext3
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xfce mailing list
> > Xfce at xfce.org
> > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xfce mailing list
> Xfce at xfce.org
> http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce
>