Vote for XFce
Joe Klemmer
klemmerj at webtrek.com
Wed Jul 3 16:25:33 CEST 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Net Llama! wrote:
> I dunno either. It remains a mystery to me how they turned, what had
> quite a lot of potential, into some of the most bloated unstable code
> ever to run this side of M$. KDE-1.1.2 was the last decent release from
> them, and even that wasn't a speed demon.
So far (and I haven't tried KDE3 or GNOME2 yet) I have not really
found any fundamental difference between KDE and GNOME. The differences
are all cosmetic or buried deep in the code so that a user would never see
it. I honestly can't see any functional or user based difference. Oh
well, maybe it's just me...
- --
Attention all planets of the Solar Federation.
We have assumed control.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9IwleHeWRPx8OIHARAn/8AJ9lSE9x/S73rgxseQR+Lf3oV4OgggCglO/L
hAgNhc7Dd4+v7WvjCL3nwoA=
=TKRg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Xfce
mailing list