GTK2
Chuck Mead
csm at redhat.com
Mon Dec 30 17:32:34 CET 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Chris Meyers posted the following:
CM>I'm extremely disappointed in gtk2. Although it looks
CM>better and seems to have better features, it's the
CM>slowes t thing I've used yet. I'm using a P-266 with
CM>160mb of ram and gedit runs so slowly, I had to switch
CM>to kate. I've noticed the same thing from all apps I
CM>use that have upgraded to gtk2. By contrast, kde3
CM>seems faster and more usable than kde2. What gives? If
CM>xfce migrates to gtk2, won't it just pick up that same
CM>bulk and slowness? What's the point of a lightweight
CM>desktop built on a slow, bulky gtk2?
It's fast as greased lightening for me!
- --
Chuck Mead <csm at redhat.com>
Instructor, GLS
RHCE, RHCI, RHCX
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+EHUkNu5VUC9TaJgRAn6kAJ9XUs1GvOXZNx8NgShOPwPNxWRvjgCePJqN
jhhhwI776mB+wNELJZXWi9g=
=0z+t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Xfce
mailing list