[XFCE 0000016]: a bit of license dimness
xfce-bugs at xfce.org
xfce-bugs at xfce.org
Mon Nov 24 23:56:15 CET 2003
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
=======================================================================
http://bugs.xfce.org/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0000016
=======================================================================
Reporter: jimmy
Handler:
=======================================================================
Project: XFCE
Bug ID: 0000016
Category: other
Reproducibility: N/A
Severity: text
Priority: normal
Status: new
=======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2003-11-18 14:31 GMT
Last Modified: 2003-11-24 22:56 GMT
=======================================================================
Summary: a bit of license dimness
Description:
I wanted to particularize the xfce-4 package licenses for ROCK-Linux, but
noticed some ambiguosities:
- xfce4-systray.spec says "GPL", but the COPYING included is BSD
(including 4.0.1).
- xffm-icons.spec says "GPL", but the COPYING included is empty.
- xfce4-themes.spec says "BSD, custom", but the LICENSE-s included are GPL
and custom [DESIGN SCIENCE LICENSE].
Can you please clarify these? Sounds stupid, I know... but in these
SCO-lawsuit days it's good to be 100% sure.
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
olivier - 2003-11-24 22:56 GMT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mailed developers about licence issues.
Olivier.
More information about the Xfce-dev
mailing list