From landy at despiertapr.com Thu Jan 16 00:31:14 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:31:14 -0500 (EST) Subject: xffm Message-ID: <20030115233114.32D8A3284DE@despiertapr.com> only once was i able to build xffm can someone shed some light? landie at pepino:~/xfce-devel/xffm > make Makefile:193: warning: overriding commands for target `_AM_File' Makefile:183: warning: ignoring old commands for target `_AM_File' Makefile:212: warning: overriding commands for target `[]' Makefile:202: warning: ignoring old commands for target `[]' make: *** No rule to make target `_AM_File,', needed by `all-recursive-am'. Stop. From edscott at imp.mx Thu Jan 16 15:53:25 2003 From: edscott at imp.mx (edscott wilson garcia) Date: 16 Jan 2003 08:53:25 -0600 Subject: xffm In-Reply-To: <20030115233114.32D8A3284DE@despiertapr.com> References: <20030115233114.32D8A3284DE@despiertapr.com> Message-ID: <1042728806.21584.35.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> El mi?, 15-01-2003 a las 17:31, Landy Roman escribi?: > only once was i able to build xffm > > can someone shed some light? > If you have trouble, you should do a ./autogen.sh first. If that fails it will probably tell you what's wrong. > > landie at pepino:~/xfce-devel/xffm > make > Makefile:193: warning: overriding commands for target `_AM_File' > Makefile:183: warning: ignoring old commands for target > `_AM_File' > Makefile:212: warning: overriding commands for target `[]' > Makefile:202: warning: ignoring old commands for target `[]' > make: *** No rule to make target `_AM_File,', needed by > `all-recursive-am'. Stop. > _______________________________________________ > Xfce-dev mailing list > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev From landy at despiertapr.com Fri Jan 17 00:18:49 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:18:49 -0500 (EST) Subject: xffm In-Reply-To: <1042728806.21584.35.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> References: <20030115233114.32D8A3284DE@despiertapr.com> <1042728806.21584.35.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> Message-ID: <20030116231849.E40513284DD@despiertapr.com> > > If you have trouble, you should do a ./autogen.sh first. If > that fails it will probably tell you what's wrong. last 2 days trying to check out it times out? anyone experiencing this problem? From MisterMoe at hackerboard.de Fri Jan 17 00:21:34 2003 From: MisterMoe at hackerboard.de (Moritz Heiber) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:21:34 +0100 Subject: xffm In-Reply-To: <20030116231849.E40513284DD@despiertapr.com> References: <20030115233114.32D8A3284DE@despiertapr.com> <1042728806.21584.35.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <20030116231849.E40513284DD@despiertapr.com> Message-ID: <20030117002134.0d512d06.MisterMoe@hackerboard.de> Have a look at the Sourceforge status page http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1 Bye, Moritz On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:18:49 -0500 (EST) Landy Roman wrote: > > > > If you have trouble, you should do a ./autogen.sh first. If > > that fails it will probably tell you what's wrong. > > > last 2 days trying to check out it times out? > > anyone experiencing this problem? > _______________________________________________ > Xfce-dev mailing list > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev From landy at despiertapr.com Fri Jan 17 00:26:11 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:26:11 -0500 (EST) Subject: xffm In-Reply-To: <20030117002134.0d512d06.MisterMoe@hackerboard.de> References: <20030115233114.32D8A3284DE@despiertapr.com> <1042728806.21584.35.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <20030116231849.E40513284DD@despiertapr.com> <20030117002134.0d512d06.MisterMoe@hackerboard.de> Message-ID: <20030116232611.31E1B3284DD@despiertapr.com> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:21:34 +0100 Moritz Heiber wrote: > net this does not help me everything says online but i still can't conect From MisterMoe at hackerboard.de Fri Jan 17 00:27:42 2003 From: MisterMoe at hackerboard.de (MisterMoe) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:27:42 +0100 Subject: xffm In-Reply-To: <20030116232611.31E1B3284DD@despiertapr.com> References: <20030115233114.32D8A3284DE@despiertapr.com> <1042728806.21584.35.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <20030116231849.E40513284DD@despiertapr.com> <20030117002134.0d512d06.MisterMoe@hackerboard.de> <20030116232611.31E1B3284DD@despiertapr.com> Message-ID: <20030117002742.7439de59.MisterMoe@hackerboard.de> Ah common ... have a closer look On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 18:26:11 -0500 (EST) Landy Roman wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:21:34 +0100 > Moritz Heiber wrote: > > > net > > this does not help me everything says online but i still can't > conect > _______________________________________________ > Xfce-dev mailing list > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev From jens at irs-net.com Fri Jan 17 23:33:39 2003 From: jens at irs-net.com (Jens Luedicke) Date: 17 Jan 2003 23:33:39 +0100 Subject: xffm small gui changes Message-ID: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> Hi ... I found a small cosmetic issue in xffm and changed it. I removed two labels from the glade project file and used the checkbutton's gtk_button_set_label() functions for displaying the text that was displayed in those two extra lables. A little less code :) -- Jens Luedicke "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." --Sam Brown -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xffm.glade.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 2918 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: input.c.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 1858 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jens at irs-net.com Fri Jan 17 23:58:49 2003 From: jens at irs-net.com (Jens Luedicke) Date: 17 Jan 2003 23:58:49 +0100 Subject: xffm small gui changes In-Reply-To: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> References: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> Message-ID: <1042844328.29473.2.camel@cello> Hi ... I removed two extra frames (scrolled window and viewport) around the file tree. There were not used anywhere in the code. The new patch includes the CheckButton/Label patch too. On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 23:33, Jens Luedicke wrote: > Hi ... > > I found a small cosmetic issue in xffm and changed it. > > I removed two labels from the glade project file and used the > checkbutton's gtk_button_set_label() functions for displaying > the text that was displayed in those two extra lables. > > A little less code :) -- Jens Luedicke "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." --Sam Brown -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xffm.glade-2.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 3840 bytes Desc: not available URL: From landy at despiertapr.com Sat Jan 18 15:55:27 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 09:55:27 -0500 (EST) Subject: xffm Message-ID: <20030118145527.1677F3284DD@despiertapr.com> looks promising but the last time i was able to build sffm was like 3 weeks ago i see lots of people with similar problem. can someone address the issues please. landie at pepino:~/xfce-devel/xffm > make Makefile:193: warning: overriding commands for target `_AM_File' Makefile:183: warning: ignoring old commands for target `_AM_File' Makefile:212: warning: overriding commands for target `[]' Makefile:202: warning: ignoring old commands for target `[]' make: *** No rule to make target `_AM_File,', needed by `all-recursive-am'. Stop. From edscott at imp.mx Mon Jan 20 17:50:37 2003 From: edscott at imp.mx (edscott wilson garcia) Date: 20 Jan 2003 10:50:37 -0600 Subject: xffm small gui changes In-Reply-To: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> References: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> Message-ID: <1043081438.21584.185.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> Have you commited these changes to CVS? Please do. Edscott El vie, 17-01-2003 a las 16:33, Jens Luedicke escribi?: > Hi ... > > I found a small cosmetic issue in xffm and changed it. > > I removed two labels from the glade project file and used the > checkbutton's gtk_button_set_label() functions for displaying > the text that was displayed in those two extra lables. > > A little less code :) > > -- > Jens Luedicke > > "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with > substance." > --Sam Brown > > > ---- > > Index: xffm/xffm.glade > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/xfce/xfce-devel/xffm/xffm.glade,v > retrieving revision 1.11 > diff -r1.11 xffm.glade > 372,373c372 > < gnome-stock-text-numbered-list > < 1 > --- > > gnome-stock-text-numbered-list > 2155,2176d2153 > < > < True > < label17 > < False > < False > < GTK_JUSTIFY_LEFT > < False > < False > < 0.5 > < 0.5 > < 0 > < 0 > < > < > < 0 > < False > < False > < GTK_PACK_END > < > < > < > < > 2180c2157 > < > --- > > checkbutton2 > 2196,2217d2172 > < > < True > < label16 > < False > < False > < GTK_JUSTIFY_LEFT > < False > < False > < 0.5 > < 0.5 > < 0 > < 0 > < > < > < 0 > < False > < False > < GTK_PACK_END > < > < > < > < > 2221c2176 > < > --- > > checkbutton1 > 2569,2572d2523 > < False > < False > < 0.5 > < 0.5 > 3085,3086d3035 > < 2 > < 2 > ---- > > Index: xffm/src/input.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/xfce/xfce-devel/xffm/src/input.c,v > retrieving revision 1.12 > diff -r1.12 input.c > 64c64,65 > < GtkLabel *label,*check_label1,*check_label2; > --- > > GtkButton *check_button1, *check_button2; > > GtkLabel *label; > 78d78 > < hideit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > 80d79 > < hideit(tree_details->window,"checklabel2"); > 83,89c82,87 > < w=(GtkToggleButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window,"checkbutton1"); > < if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(w))gtk_toggle_button_set_active (w,FALSE); > < w=(GtkToggleButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checkbutton2"); > < if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(w)) gtk_toggle_button_set_active (w,FALSE); > < check_label1=(GtkLabel *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checklabel1"); > < check_label2=(GtkLabel *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checklabel2"); > < > --- > > check_button1 = (GtkCheckButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window,"checkbutton1"); > > if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(check_button1))gtk_toggle_button_set_active (check_button1,FALSE); > > > > check_button2 =(GtkCheckButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checkbutton2"); > > if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(check_button2)) gtk_toggle_button_set_active (check_button2,FALSE); > > > 169,170c167 > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label1,_("Directory")); > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > --- > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button1,_("Directory")); > 193,194c190 > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label2,_("Remember")); > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel2"); > --- > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button2,_("Remember")); > 202,203c198 > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label1,_("In terminal")); > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > --- > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button1,_("In terminal")); From edscott at imp.mx Mon Jan 20 17:55:43 2003 From: edscott at imp.mx (edscott wilson garcia) Date: 20 Jan 2003 10:55:43 -0600 Subject: xffm small gui changes In-Reply-To: <1042844328.29473.2.camel@cello> References: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> <1042844328.29473.2.camel@cello> Message-ID: <1043081743.21584.197.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> El vie, 17-01-2003 a las 16:58, Jens Luedicke escribi?: > Hi ... > > I removed two extra frames (scrolled window and viewport) around > the file tree. There were not used anywhere in the code. Isn't the scrolled window necessary when the expansion of the treeview calls for it? That was the case with gtk-1.2 ctree's. Edscott > > The new patch includes the CheckButton/Label patch too. > > > On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 23:33, Jens Luedicke wrote: > > Hi ... > > > > I found a small cosmetic issue in xffm and changed it. > > > > I removed two labels from the glade project file and used the > > checkbutton's gtk_button_set_label() functions for displaying > > the text that was displayed in those two extra lables. > > > > A little less code :) > -- > From jens at irs-net.com Mon Jan 20 18:25:28 2003 From: jens at irs-net.com (Jens Luedicke) Date: 20 Jan 2003 18:25:28 +0100 Subject: xffm small gui changes In-Reply-To: <1043081438.21584.185.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> References: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> <1043081438.21584.185.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> Message-ID: <1043083528.15194.6.camel@cello> On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 17:50, edscott wilson garcia wrote: > Have you commited these changes to CVS? Please do. > I'm not a developer with CVS access. but I could dig out my sf account so olivier can add me as an developer. > Edscott > > El vie, 17-01-2003 a las 16:33, Jens Luedicke escribi?: > > Hi ... > > > > I found a small cosmetic issue in xffm and changed it. > > > > I removed two labels from the glade project file and used the > > checkbutton's gtk_button_set_label() functions for displaying > > the text that was displayed in those two extra lables. > > > > A little less code :) > > > > -- > > Jens Luedicke > > > > "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with > > substance." > > --Sam Brown > > > > > > ---- > > > > > Index: xffm/xffm.glade > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvsroot/xfce/xfce-devel/xffm/xffm.glade,v > > retrieving revision 1.11 > > diff -r1.11 xffm.glade > > 372,373c372 > > < gnome-stock-text-numbered-list > > < 1 > > --- > > > gnome-stock-text-numbered-list > > 2155,2176d2153 > > < > > < True > > < label17 > > < False > > < False > > < GTK_JUSTIFY_LEFT > > < False > > < False > > < 0.5 > > < 0.5 > > < 0 > > < 0 > > < > > < > > < 0 > > < False > > < False > > < GTK_PACK_END > > < > > < > > < > > < > > 2180c2157 > > < > > --- > > > checkbutton2 > > 2196,2217d2172 > > < > > < True > > < label16 > > < False > > < False > > < GTK_JUSTIFY_LEFT > > < False > > < False > > < 0.5 > > < 0.5 > > < 0 > > < 0 > > < > > < > > < 0 > > < False > > < False > > < GTK_PACK_END > > < > > < > > < > > < > > 2221c2176 > > < > > --- > > > checkbutton1 > > 2569,2572d2523 > > < False > > < False > > < 0.5 > > < 0.5 > > 3085,3086d3035 > > < 2 > > < 2 > > ---- > > > > > Index: xffm/src/input.c > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvsroot/xfce/xfce-devel/xffm/src/input.c,v > > retrieving revision 1.12 > > diff -r1.12 input.c > > 64c64,65 > > < GtkLabel *label,*check_label1,*check_label2; > > --- > > > GtkButton *check_button1, *check_button2; > > > GtkLabel *label; > > 78d78 > > < hideit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > 80d79 > > < hideit(tree_details->window,"checklabel2"); > > 83,89c82,87 > > < w=(GtkToggleButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window,"checkbutton1"); > > < if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(w))gtk_toggle_button_set_active (w,FALSE); > > < w=(GtkToggleButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checkbutton2"); > > < if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(w)) gtk_toggle_button_set_active (w,FALSE); > > < check_label1=(GtkLabel *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checklabel1"); > > < check_label2=(GtkLabel *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checklabel2"); > > < > > --- > > > check_button1 = (GtkCheckButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window,"checkbutton1"); > > > if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(check_button1))gtk_toggle_button_set_active (check_button1,FALSE); > > > > > > check_button2 =(GtkCheckButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checkbutton2"); > > > if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(check_button2)) gtk_toggle_button_set_active (check_button2,FALSE); > > > > > 169,170c167 > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label1,_("Directory")); > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > --- > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button1,_("Directory")); > > 193,194c190 > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label2,_("Remember")); > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel2"); > > --- > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button2,_("Remember")); > > 202,203c198 > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label1,_("In terminal")); > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > --- > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button1,_("In terminal")); > > > _______________________________________________ > Xfce-dev mailing list > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev -- Jens Luedicke "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." --Sam Brown From jens at irs-net.com Mon Jan 20 18:27:03 2003 From: jens at irs-net.com (Jens Luedicke) Date: 20 Jan 2003 18:27:03 +0100 Subject: xffm small gui changes In-Reply-To: <1043081743.21584.197.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> References: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> <1042844328.29473.2.camel@cello> <1043081743.21584.197.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> Message-ID: <1043083623.15194.9.camel@cello> On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 17:55, edscott wilson garcia wrote: > El vie, 17-01-2003 a las 16:58, Jens Luedicke escribi?: > > Hi ... > > > > I removed two extra frames (scrolled window and viewport) around > > the file tree. There were not used anywhere in the code. > > Isn't the scrolled window necessary when the expansion of the treeview > calls for it? That was the case with gtk-1.2 ctree's. > I don't know, but it works fine here. -- Jens Luedicke "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." --Sam Brown From edscott at imp.mx Mon Jan 20 18:37:34 2003 From: edscott at imp.mx (edscott wilson garcia) Date: 20 Jan 2003 11:37:34 -0600 Subject: xffm small gui changes In-Reply-To: <1043083528.15194.6.camel@cello> References: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> <1043081438.21584.185.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <1043083528.15194.6.camel@cello> Message-ID: <1043084254.8038.215.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> El lun, 20-01-2003 a las 11:25, Jens Luedicke escribi?: > On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 17:50, edscott wilson garcia wrote: > > Have you commited these changes to CVS? Please do. > > > > I'm not a developer with CVS access. > > but I could dig out my sf account so olivier > can add me as an developer. Ok, I'll do the updating today. But first I'll check and see whether if the treeview can do without the scrolled window. Edscott > > > Edscott > > > > El vie, 17-01-2003 a las 16:33, Jens Luedicke escribi?: > > > Hi ... > > > > > > I found a small cosmetic issue in xffm and changed it. > > > > > > I removed two labels from the glade project file and used the > > > checkbutton's gtk_button_set_label() functions for displaying > > > the text that was displayed in those two extra lables. > > > > > > A little less code :) > > > > > > -- > > > Jens Luedicke > > > > > > "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with > > > substance." > > > --Sam Brown > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > Index: xffm/xffm.glade > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /cvsroot/xfce/xfce-devel/xffm/xffm.glade,v > > > retrieving revision 1.11 > > > diff -r1.11 xffm.glade > > > 372,373c372 > > > < gnome-stock-text-numbered-list > > > < 1 > > > --- > > > > gnome-stock-text-numbered-list > > > 2155,2176d2153 > > > < > > > < True > > > < label17 > > > < False > > > < False > > > < GTK_JUSTIFY_LEFT > > > < False > > > < False > > > < 0.5 > > > < 0.5 > > > < 0 > > > < 0 > > > < > > > < > > > < 0 > > > < False > > > < False > > > < GTK_PACK_END > > > < > > > < > > > < > > > < > > > 2180c2157 > > > < > > > --- > > > > checkbutton2 > > > 2196,2217d2172 > > > < > > > < True > > > < label16 > > > < False > > > < False > > > < GTK_JUSTIFY_LEFT > > > < False > > > < False > > > < 0.5 > > > < 0.5 > > > < 0 > > > < 0 > > > < > > > < > > > < 0 > > > < False > > > < False > > > < GTK_PACK_END > > > < > > > < > > > < > > > < > > > 2221c2176 > > > < > > > --- > > > > checkbutton1 > > > 2569,2572d2523 > > > < False > > > < False > > > < 0.5 > > > < 0.5 > > > 3085,3086d3035 > > > < 2 > > > < 2 > > > ---- > > > > > > > > Index: xffm/src/input.c > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /cvsroot/xfce/xfce-devel/xffm/src/input.c,v > > > retrieving revision 1.12 > > > diff -r1.12 input.c > > > 64c64,65 > > > < GtkLabel *label,*check_label1,*check_label2; > > > --- > > > > GtkButton *check_button1, *check_button2; > > > > GtkLabel *label; > > > 78d78 > > > < hideit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > > 80d79 > > > < hideit(tree_details->window,"checklabel2"); > > > 83,89c82,87 > > > < w=(GtkToggleButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window,"checkbutton1"); > > > < if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(w))gtk_toggle_button_set_active (w,FALSE); > > > < w=(GtkToggleButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checkbutton2"); > > > < if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(w)) gtk_toggle_button_set_active (w,FALSE); > > > < check_label1=(GtkLabel *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checklabel1"); > > > < check_label2=(GtkLabel *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checklabel2"); > > > < > > > --- > > > > check_button1 = (GtkCheckButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window,"checkbutton1"); > > > > if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(check_button1))gtk_toggle_button_set_active (check_button1,FALSE); > > > > > > > > check_button2 =(GtkCheckButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checkbutton2"); > > > > if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(check_button2)) gtk_toggle_button_set_active (check_button2,FALSE); > > > > > > > 169,170c167 > > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label1,_("Directory")); > > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > > --- > > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button1,_("Directory")); > > > 193,194c190 > > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label2,_("Remember")); > > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel2"); > > > --- > > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button2,_("Remember")); > > > 202,203c198 > > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label1,_("In terminal")); > > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > > --- > > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button1,_("In terminal")); > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xfce-dev mailing list > > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev > -- > Jens Luedicke > > "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with > substance." > --Sam Brown > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xfce-dev mailing list > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev > From fourdan at xfce.org Mon Jan 20 18:37:59 2003 From: fourdan at xfce.org (Olivier Fourdan) Date: 20 Jan 2003 18:37:59 +0100 Subject: xffm small gui changes In-Reply-To: <1043083528.15194.6.camel@cello> References: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> <1043081438.21584.185.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <1043083528.15194.6.camel@cello> Message-ID: <1043084279.9627.8.camel@locahost> Jens, Yes, send me your login name off list. Cheers, Olivier. On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 18:25, Jens Luedicke wrote: > On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 17:50, edscott wilson garcia wrote: > > Have you commited these changes to CVS? Please do. > > > > I'm not a developer with CVS access. > > but I could dig out my sf account so olivier > can add me as an developer. > > > Edscott > > > > El vie, 17-01-2003 a las 16:33, Jens Luedicke escribi?: > > > Hi ... > > > > > > I found a small cosmetic issue in xffm and changed it. > > > > > > I removed two labels from the glade project file and used the > > > checkbutton's gtk_button_set_label() functions for displaying > > > the text that was displayed in those two extra lables. > > > > > > A little less code :) > > > > > > -- > > > Jens Luedicke > > > > > > "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with > > > substance." > > > --Sam Brown > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > Index: xffm/xffm.glade > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /cvsroot/xfce/xfce-devel/xffm/xffm.glade,v > > > retrieving revision 1.11 > > > diff -r1.11 xffm.glade > > > 372,373c372 > > > < gnome-stock-text-numbered-list > > > < 1 > > > --- > > > > gnome-stock-text-numbered-list > > > 2155,2176d2153 > > > < > > > < True > > > < label17 > > > < False > > > < False > > > < GTK_JUSTIFY_LEFT > > > < False > > > < False > > > < 0.5 > > > < 0.5 > > > < 0 > > > < 0 > > > < > > > < > > > < 0 > > > < False > > > < False > > > < GTK_PACK_END > > > < > > > < > > > < > > > < > > > 2180c2157 > > > < > > > --- > > > > checkbutton2 > > > 2196,2217d2172 > > > < > > > < True > > > < label16 > > > < False > > > < False > > > < GTK_JUSTIFY_LEFT > > > < False > > > < False > > > < 0.5 > > > < 0.5 > > > < 0 > > > < 0 > > > < > > > < > > > < 0 > > > < False > > > < False > > > < GTK_PACK_END > > > < > > > < > > > < > > > < > > > 2221c2176 > > > < > > > --- > > > > checkbutton1 > > > 2569,2572d2523 > > > < False > > > < False > > > < 0.5 > > > < 0.5 > > > 3085,3086d3035 > > > < 2 > > > < 2 > > > ---- > > > > > > > > Index: xffm/src/input.c > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /cvsroot/xfce/xfce-devel/xffm/src/input.c,v > > > retrieving revision 1.12 > > > diff -r1.12 input.c > > > 64c64,65 > > > < GtkLabel *label,*check_label1,*check_label2; > > > --- > > > > GtkButton *check_button1, *check_button2; > > > > GtkLabel *label; > > > 78d78 > > > < hideit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > > 80d79 > > > < hideit(tree_details->window,"checklabel2"); > > > 83,89c82,87 > > > < w=(GtkToggleButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window,"checkbutton1"); > > > < if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(w))gtk_toggle_button_set_active (w,FALSE); > > > < w=(GtkToggleButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checkbutton2"); > > > < if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(w)) gtk_toggle_button_set_active (w,FALSE); > > > < check_label1=(GtkLabel *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checklabel1"); > > > < check_label2=(GtkLabel *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checklabel2"); > > > < > > > --- > > > > check_button1 = (GtkCheckButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window,"checkbutton1"); > > > > if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(check_button1))gtk_toggle_button_set_active (check_button1,FALSE); > > > > > > > > check_button2 =(GtkCheckButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checkbutton2"); > > > > if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(check_button2)) gtk_toggle_button_set_active (check_button2,FALSE); > > > > > > > 169,170c167 > > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label1,_("Directory")); > > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > > --- > > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button1,_("Directory")); > > > 193,194c190 > > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label2,_("Remember")); > > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel2"); > > > --- > > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button2,_("Remember")); > > > 202,203c198 > > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label1,_("In terminal")); > > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > > --- > > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button1,_("In terminal")); > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xfce-dev mailing list > > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev -- Olivier Fourdan http://www.xfce.org From edscott at imp.mx Tue Jan 21 00:09:14 2003 From: edscott at imp.mx (edscott wilson garcia) Date: 20 Jan 2003 17:09:14 -0600 Subject: xffm small gui changes In-Reply-To: <1043084254.8038.215.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> References: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> <1043081438.21584.185.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <1043083528.15194.6.camel@cello> <1043084254.8038.215.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> Message-ID: <1043104154.927.15.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> El lun, 20-01-2003 a las 11:37, edscott wilson garcia escribi?: > El lun, 20-01-2003 a las 11:25, Jens Luedicke escribi?: > > On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 17:50, edscott wilson garcia wrote: > > > Have you commited these changes to CVS? Please do. > > > > > > > I'm not a developer with CVS access. > > > > but I could dig out my sf account so olivier > > can add me as an developer. > > Ok, I'll do the updating today. But first I'll check and see whether if > the treeview can do without the scrolled window. On a second thought, I'll leave it up to you Jens, since Olivier has approved your developer status. Edscott > > > Edscott > > > > > > Edscott > > > > > > El vie, 17-01-2003 a las 16:33, Jens Luedicke escribi?: > > > > Hi ... > > > > > > > > I found a small cosmetic issue in xffm and changed it. > > > > > > > > I removed two labels from the glade project file and used the > > > > checkbutton's gtk_button_set_label() functions for displaying > > > > the text that was displayed in those two extra lables. > > > > > > > > A little less code :) > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jens Luedicke > > > > > > > > "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with > > > > substance." > > > > --Sam Brown > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > > > > Index: xffm/xffm.glade > > > > =================================================================== > > > > RCS file: /cvsroot/xfce/xfce-devel/xffm/xffm.glade,v > > > > retrieving revision 1.11 > > > > diff -r1.11 xffm.glade > > > > 372,373c372 > > > > < gnome-stock-text-numbered-list > > > > < 1 > > > > --- > > > > > gnome-stock-text-numbered-list > > > > 2155,2176d2153 > > > > < > > > > < True > > > > < label17 > > > > < False > > > > < False > > > > < GTK_JUSTIFY_LEFT > > > > < False > > > > < False > > > > < 0.5 > > > > < 0.5 > > > > < 0 > > > > < 0 > > > > < > > > > < > > > > < 0 > > > > < False > > > > < False > > > > < GTK_PACK_END > > > > < > > > > < > > > > < > > > > < > > > > 2180c2157 > > > > < > > > > --- > > > > > checkbutton2 > > > > 2196,2217d2172 > > > > < > > > > < True > > > > < label16 > > > > < False > > > > < False > > > > < GTK_JUSTIFY_LEFT > > > > < False > > > > < False > > > > < 0.5 > > > > < 0.5 > > > > < 0 > > > > < 0 > > > > < > > > > < > > > > < 0 > > > > < False > > > > < False > > > > < GTK_PACK_END > > > > < > > > > < > > > > < > > > > < > > > > 2221c2176 > > > > < > > > > --- > > > > > checkbutton1 > > > > 2569,2572d2523 > > > > < False > > > > < False > > > > < 0.5 > > > > < 0.5 > > > > 3085,3086d3035 > > > > < 2 > > > > < 2 > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > > > > Index: xffm/src/input.c > > > > =================================================================== > > > > RCS file: /cvsroot/xfce/xfce-devel/xffm/src/input.c,v > > > > retrieving revision 1.12 > > > > diff -r1.12 input.c > > > > 64c64,65 > > > > < GtkLabel *label,*check_label1,*check_label2; > > > > --- > > > > > GtkButton *check_button1, *check_button2; > > > > > GtkLabel *label; > > > > 78d78 > > > > < hideit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > > > 80d79 > > > > < hideit(tree_details->window,"checklabel2"); > > > > 83,89c82,87 > > > > < w=(GtkToggleButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window,"checkbutton1"); > > > > < if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(w))gtk_toggle_button_set_active (w,FALSE); > > > > < w=(GtkToggleButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checkbutton2"); > > > > < if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(w)) gtk_toggle_button_set_active (w,FALSE); > > > > < check_label1=(GtkLabel *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checklabel1"); > > > > < check_label2=(GtkLabel *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checklabel2"); > > > > < > > > > --- > > > > > check_button1 = (GtkCheckButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window,"checkbutton1"); > > > > > if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(check_button1))gtk_toggle_button_set_active (check_button1,FALSE); > > > > > > > > > > check_button2 =(GtkCheckButton *)lookup_widget(tree_details->window, "checkbutton2"); > > > > > if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active(check_button2)) gtk_toggle_button_set_active (check_button2,FALSE); > > > > > > > > > 169,170c167 > > > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label1,_("Directory")); > > > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > > > --- > > > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button1,_("Directory")); > > > > 193,194c190 > > > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label2,_("Remember")); > > > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel2"); > > > > --- > > > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button2,_("Remember")); > > > > 202,203c198 > > > > < gtk_label_set_text (check_label1,_("In terminal")); > > > > < showit(tree_details->window,"checklabel1"); > > > > --- > > > > > gtk_button_set_label (check_button1,_("In terminal")); > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xfce-dev mailing list > > > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > > > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev > > -- > > Jens Luedicke > > > > "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with > > substance." > > --Sam Brown > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xfce-dev mailing list > > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xfce-dev mailing list > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev From jens at irs-net.com Tue Jan 21 01:09:03 2003 From: jens at irs-net.com (Jens Luedicke) Date: 21 Jan 2003 01:09:03 +0100 Subject: xffm small gui changes In-Reply-To: <1043104154.927.15.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> References: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> <1043081438.21584.185.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <1043083528.15194.6.camel@cello> <1043084254.8038.215.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <1043104154.927.15.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> Message-ID: <1043107743.11403.2.camel@cello> On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 00:09, edscott wilson garcia wrote: > On a second thought, I'll leave it up to you Jens, since Olivier has > approved your developer status. > I commited the changes in xffm.glade, glade_gui.[ch] and input.c. A review of the diff in ViewCVS shows that my glade-2 created in some places a very different code. I hope it doesn't cause any unwanted behaviour. -- Jens Luedicke "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." --Sam Brown From landy at despiertapr.com Tue Jan 21 01:26:24 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:26:24 -0500 (EST) Subject: dbh Message-ID: <20030121002624.ECEF53284FD@despiertapr.com> unable to install dbh hash make[1]: Entering directory `/home/landie/dbh_1.0-11/src' Makefile:208: *** missing separator. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/landie/dbh_1.0-11/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 From landy at despiertapr.com Tue Jan 21 01:35:08 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:35:08 -0500 (EST) Subject: dbh In-Reply-To: <20030121002624.ECEF53284FD@despiertapr.com> References: <20030121002624.ECEF53284FD@despiertapr.com> Message-ID: <20030121003508.1129A3284FD@despiertapr.com> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:26:24 -0500 (EST) Landy Roman wrote: > unable to install dbh hash > its already installed from rpm but i wanted to try source [slight correction ] From Jan.Lentfer at web.de Tue Jan 21 17:34:29 2003 From: Jan.Lentfer at web.de (Jan Lentfer) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:34:29 +0000 Subject: xfce4 on Debian/Alpha Message-ID: <20030121163429.260cc3ba.Jan.Lentfer@web.de> Hi all, today I tried to compile the cvs on my PWS 500a running Debian testing. The compilation of all modules went through sucessfully, but when I try to run xfce4 using the Xnest script from http://members.home.nl/jbhuijsmans/xfce4-cvs.html all I get is a blue window. The messages are the following: lentferj at neslonek:~$ ./xfce4 Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing from list! ** Message: scanning /home/lentferj/.xfce4/settings/plugins/... ** Message: scanning /usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/... Failed to open file '/home/lentferj/.xfce4/settings/gtk.xml': No such file or directory ** Message: module ui (/usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/ui_plugin.so) successful ly loaded Failed to open file '/home/lentferj/.xfce4/settings/gtk.xml': No such file or directory Failed to open file '/home/lentferj/.xfce4/settings/keyboard.xml': No such file or directory ** Message: module keyboard (/usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/keyboard_plugin.so ) successfully loaded Failed to open file '/home/lentferj/.xfce4/settings/gtk.xml': No such file or directory Failed to open file '/home/lentferj/.xfce4/settings/mouse.xml': No such file or directory ** Message: module mouse (/usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/mouse_plugin.so) succ essfully loaded ** Message: module xfce (/usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/libxfce4settings.so) s uccessfully loaded Failed to open file '/home/lentferj/.xfce4/settings/xfwm4.xml': No such file or directory ** Message: module xfwm4 (/usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/xfwm4_plugin.so) succ essfully loaded Failed to open file '/home/lentferj/.xfce4/settings/taskbar.xml': No such file or directory ** Message: module taskbar (/usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/xftaskbar_plugin.so ) successfully loaded Failed to open file '/home/lentferj/.xfce4/settings/backdrop.xml': No such file or directory ** Message: module backdrop (/usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/backdrop_settings. so) successfully loaded ** Message: module margins (/usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/margins_settings.so ) successfully loaded ** (xfce-mcs-manager:28279): WARNING **: module /usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins /workspaces_settings.so cannot be opened (/usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/works paces_settings.so: undefined symbol: gtk_tree_path_new_from_indices) ** Message: init complete. ** Message: Using GTK+-2.0.6 ** Message: Xinerama extension disabled I installed with prefix=/usr/local/xfce4 which is in my path. It worked that way on one of my x86 boxes with debian. Any help would be appreciated. -- Jan Lentfer System Administrator Molekulare Zellbiologie / AG Holstein, TU Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstr. 10, 64287 Darmstadt From edscott at imp.mx Tue Jan 21 21:59:14 2003 From: edscott at imp.mx (edscott wilson garcia) Date: 21 Jan 2003 14:59:14 -0600 Subject: xffm small gui changes In-Reply-To: <1043107743.11403.2.camel@cello> References: <1042842819.26188.5.camel@cello> <1043081438.21584.185.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <1043083528.15194.6.camel@cello> <1043084254.8038.215.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <1043104154.927.15.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> <1043107743.11403.2.camel@cello> Message-ID: <1043182754.17606.1.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> El lun, 20-01-2003 a las 18:09, Jens Luedicke escribi?: > On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 00:09, edscott wilson garcia wrote: > > > On a second thought, I'll leave it up to you Jens, since Olivier has > > approved your developer status. > > > > I commited the changes in xffm.glade, glade_gui.[ch] and input.c. > > A review of the diff in ViewCVS shows that my glade-2 created > in some places a very different code. I hope it doesn't cause > any unwanted behaviour. It seems to work fine. I just added some missing typecasting to avoid unnecesary compiler warnings. Edscott > > > -- > Jens Luedicke > > "Never offend people with style when you can offend them with > substance." > --Sam Brown > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xfce-dev mailing list > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev From csm at redhat.com Tue Jan 21 22:18:33 2003 From: csm at redhat.com (Chuck Mead) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:18:33 -0500 (EST) Subject: xfce4 on Debian/Alpha In-Reply-To: <20030121163429.260cc3ba.Jan.Lentfer@web.de> References: <20030121163429.260cc3ba.Jan.Lentfer@web.de> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Jan Lentfer posted the following: JL>Hi all, JL> JL>today I tried to compile the cvs on my PWS 500a running Debian testing. JL>The compilation of all modules went through sucessfully, but when I try to run xfce4 using the Xnest script from http://members.home.nl/jbhuijsmans/xfce4-cvs.html all I get is a blue window. The messages are the following: JL>** (xfce-mcs-manager:28279): WARNING **: module /usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins JL>/workspaces_settings.so cannot be opened (/usr/local/xfce4/lib/xfce-mcs-manager/plugins/works JL>paces_settings.so: undefined symbol: gtk_tree_path_new_from_indices) JL>** Message: init complete. JL>** Message: Using GTK+-2.0.6 JL>** Message: Xinerama extension disabled The "workspaces_settings.so cannot be opened" was an error I got yesterday. They fixed it but it's in cvs code which may not have been exported yet... where did you get your code? - -- Chuck Mead Instructor, GLS RHCE, RHCI, RHCX -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+LbkrNu5VUC9TaJgRAn9NAJ9jUntd/iWpDDJgGuv99LonSjggmQCeNlYa mwn4SOYPxlj5Y2RPRHzIkK8= =XjqY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From Jan.Lentfer at web.de Tue Jan 21 22:23:44 2003 From: Jan.Lentfer at web.de (Jan Lentfer) Date: 21 Jan 2003 22:23:44 +0100 Subject: xfce4 on Debian/Alpha In-Reply-To: References: <20030121163429.260cc3ba.Jan.Lentfer@web.de> Message-ID: <1043184225.564.1.camel@jan-linnb> Am Die, 2003-01-21 um 22.18 schrieb Chuck Mead: > The "workspaces_settings.so cannot be opened" was an error I got > yesterday. They fixed it but it's in cvs code which may not have been > exported yet... where did you get your code? > from sourceforge's cvs Cheers, Jan From csm at MoonGroup.com Wed Jan 22 04:02:56 2003 From: csm at MoonGroup.com (Chuck Mead) Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:02:56 -0500 (EST) Subject: xfce4 on Debian/Alpha In-Reply-To: <1043184225.564.1.camel@jan-linnb> References: <20030121163429.260cc3ba.Jan.Lentfer@web.de> <1043184225.564.1.camel@jan-linnb> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Jan Lentfer posted the following: JL>Am Die, 2003-01-21 um 22.18 schrieb Chuck Mead: JL> JL>> The "workspaces_settings.so cannot be opened" was an error I got JL>> yesterday. They fixed it but it's in cvs code which may not have been JL>> exported yet... where did you get your code? JL>> JL> JL>from sourceforge's cvs I suggest you update and try again... that bug was fixed for me yesterday! - -- csm I am not a curmudgeon! No... really... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Lgniv6Gjsf2pQ0oRAu2MAJ40F7dMz7u8ZYlW2X6oEzOWGNHmegCgtP6r 7kJqbSGxr+wjGo0gNIOnxU4= =/sLC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From landy at despiertapr.com Sat Jan 25 19:49:59 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 13:49:59 -0500 (EST) Subject: Is xfce4 close to release? In-Reply-To: <1043456328.3591.20.camel@emperor> References: <3E2FFD1E.2030205@mcesr.etat.lu> <20030124100736.1c4b0232.botsie@myrealbox.com> <20030124085514.426ab50e.wdtrenker@yahoo.ca> <1043429129.1360.17.camel@computer83.belvoir.army.mil> <20030124173550.52b5a553.sjt@star.sr.bham.ac.uk> <1043429839.1990.25.camel@computer83.belvoir.army.mil> <20030124013359.4846d8dc.res005ru@gte.net> <1043456328.3591.20.camel@emperor> Message-ID: <20030125184959.E49E23284FF@despiertapr.com> On 24 Jan 2003 19:58:47 -0500 Joe Klemmer wrote: > On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 02:33, Rick Sivernell wrote: i would say at least 3 months and still xffm wont compile on me From landy at despiertapr.com Sun Jan 26 08:19:13 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 02:19:13 -0500 (EST) Subject: xfce4 is great In-Reply-To: <20030125194204.54b67f7d.erichey2@attbi.com> References: <20030125194204.54b67f7d.erichey2@attbi.com> Message-ID: <20030126071913.27FDE3284FD@despiertapr.com> BTW quit is no longer working for me From landy at despiertapr.com Sun Jan 26 17:37:13 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 11:37:13 -0500 (EST) Subject: panel Message-ID: <20030126163713.2331A3284FD@despiertapr.com> gtop shows the xfce4-panel using a huge 23mb is that normal? From landy at despiertapr.com Sun Jan 26 17:38:53 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 11:38:53 -0500 (EST) Subject: panel In-Reply-To: <20030126163713.2331A3284FD@despiertapr.com> References: <20030126163713.2331A3284FD@despiertapr.com> Message-ID: <20030126163853.BF4933284FD@despiertapr.com> On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 11:37:13 -0500 (EST) Landy Roman wrote: > gtop shows the xfce4-panel using a huge 23mb is that normal? ok by exiting and coming back now it looks for normal 6.4MB From Peeter.Vois at mail.ee Sun Jan 26 21:58:21 2003 From: Peeter.Vois at mail.ee (Peeter Vois) Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 22:58:21 +0200 Subject: Is xfce4 close to release? In-Reply-To: <20030125184959.E49E23284FF@despiertapr.com> References: <3E2FFD1E.2030205@mcesr.etat.lu> <20030124100736.1c4b0232.botsie@myrealbox.com> <20030124085514.426ab50e.wdtrenker@yahoo.ca> <1043429129.1360.17.camel@computer83.belvoir.army.mil> <20030124173550.52b5a553.sjt@star.sr.bham.ac.uk> <1043429839.1990.25.camel@computer83.belvoir.army.mil> <20030124013359.4846d8dc.res005ru@gte.net> <1043456328.3591.20.camel@emperor> <20030125184959.E49E23284FF@despiertapr.com> Message-ID: <20030126225821.72ce72bf.Peeter.Vois@mail.ee> Hi, I do not know your system but maybe you can send some description and the step by step way to compilation error. Best Regards ... Peeter Vois http://my.tele2.ee/vois On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 13:49:59 -0500 (EST) Landy Roman wrote: > On 24 Jan 2003 19:58:47 -0500 > Joe Klemmer wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 02:33, Rick Sivernell wrote: > > > > i would say at least 3 months and still xffm wont compile on me > _______________________________________________ > Xfce-dev mailing list > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev From landy at despiertapr.com Tue Jan 28 02:13:35 2003 From: landy at despiertapr.com (Landy Roman) Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:13:35 -0500 (EST) Subject: xffm Message-ID: <20030128011335.32F0D3284FD@despiertapr.com> my problems with xffm were solved i upgraded libtool from 1.3.5 to 1.4.3 and upgraded pkg-config from foo.14. to foo.15 and did autogen.sh without using target and BINGO thanks to all From edscott at imp.mx Tue Jan 28 17:02:33 2003 From: edscott at imp.mx (edscott wilson garcia) Date: 28 Jan 2003 10:02:33 -0600 Subject: xffm In-Reply-To: <20030128011335.32F0D3284FD@despiertapr.com> References: <20030128011335.32F0D3284FD@despiertapr.com> Message-ID: <1043769753.11273.18.camel@mateco8.eco.imp.mx> El lun, 27-01-2003 a las 19:13, Landy Roman escribi?: > my problems with xffm were solved > > i upgraded libtool from 1.3.5 to 1.4.3 and upgraded pkg-config > from foo.14. to foo.15 and did autogen.sh without using target > and BINGO I'll try to put these requirements into the configure script. > > thanks to all > _______________________________________________ > Xfce-dev mailing list > Xfce-dev at moongroup.com > http://moongroup.com/mailman/listinfo/xfce-dev