[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 10217] Xflock4 doesn't know about proper lockers

bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org
Sun Oct 12 18:42:03 CEST 2014


https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10217

--- Comment #31 from Jarno Suni <8 at iki.fi> ---
(In reply to Simon Steinbeiss from comment #22)
> What annoys me a bit to be honest is that we currently have locking settings
> in the session manager settings and in xfce4-power-manager.
> 
> If the settings in the session manager will be improved, I guess it would
> make sense to consolidate them there and simply don't show locking stuff in
> xfpm (e.g. "lock on suspend"), at least if xfce4-session is running /
> available.

IIRC some consolidation has been done already. Besides, please note that
light-locker has its own setting called "Lock on suspend" that works
independently of settings in the xfce4-power-manager and in xfce4-session. I
think having a setting is more important for the power manager; Optional
separate "Action Buttons" for suspend and lock&suspend would be nice in panel
anyway for maximum flexibility (though light-locker might lock no matter which
one you choose).

[...] 
> As a second step we could take a look the various bugreports surrounding
> xflock and xfpm-locking and consider whether to implement options/settings
> for some of the lockers. E.g. when a dead simple locker is used that has no
> screensaver integrated, it might be nice to fade to black and decrease the
> X11 DPMS settings (and resetting that of course upon unlock/wakeup).

"xset dpms force off" does the trick in xflock4 with those lockers.
light-locker also turns off display when it locks. i3lock has --dpms option and
can turn power off also, if you press Esc on lock screen.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the Xfce-bugs mailing list