[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 10217] Xflock4 doesn't knows about actual lockers

bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org
Tue Aug 12 17:57:43 CEST 2014


Andrew Chadwick <a.t.chadwick at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |a.t.chadwick at gmail.com

--- Comment #17 from Andrew Chadwick <a.t.chadwick at gmail.com> ---
I find that light-locker does the right thing under Debian testing/unstable: by
itself it will lock my laptop's screen when it suspends, which xscreensaver no
longer does after the latest upower/systemd/logind shuffles. For a whole system
which uses lightdm for logins, it really does look like the right approach.

+1 on Jarno Suni's patch 5359. light-locker-command is sensible in that it will
exit with a nonzero status if light-locker is not running, just like the
commands for other screensaver daemons.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

More information about the Xfce-bugs mailing list