[Xfce-bugs] [Bug 4448] Xflock4 should not just assume xlock is installed

bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org
Sun Oct 5 17:22:13 CEST 2008


http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4448





--- Comment #9 from Dieter Plaetinck <dieter at plaetinck.be>  2008-10-05 15:22:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > > And fallback to xlockmore (which has nothing to do with xorg, btw).
> > 
> > If it's available!  (That was my whole point, not everyone has it)  Xflock4
> > should be prepared for when no screensaver/lock tool is available and show an
> > error appropriately.
> 
> I'd say, if $user don't have any locking stuff, we don't give a shit. It'll
> fail, but eh, that's normal.

I hope you're joking.  xflock4 comes with Xfce, so users expect it to work and
not to break.  They expect to have locking functionality or at least to be
given instructions on how to get what they want.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.xfce.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.



More information about the Xfce-bugs mailing list