[Xfce-bugs] [XFCE 0000169]: xfcalendar-0.1.6-1.src.rpm isn't 64-bit correct

[xfce-bugs at xfce.org]

The following bug has been RESOLVED.
=======================================================================
http://bugs.xfce.org/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0000169
=======================================================================
Reporter:                   joshmule
Handler:                    huysmans
=======================================================================
Project:                    XFCE
Bug ID:                     0000169
Category:                   general
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     resolved
Resolution:                 not a bug
=======================================================================
Date Submitted:             2004-04-08 21:16 GMT
Last Modified:              2004-04-14 06:03 GMT
=======================================================================
Summary:                    xfcalendar-0.1.6-1.src.rpm isn't 64-bit correct
Description: 
When compiling xfcalendar-0.1.6-1.src.rpm, I see this:

gcc -O2 -g -o xfcalendar xfcalendar-callbacks.o xfcalendar-interface.o
xfcalendar-main.o xfcalendar-support.o xfcalendar-xfce_trayicon.o
-Wl,--export-dynamic -Wl,-R/usr/lib64  -L/usr/X11R6/lib64
/usr/lib64/libxfcegui4.so -lXinerama -lXext -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0
-latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0
-lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl /usr/lib64/libdbh.so -lm
/usr/lib64/libxfce4mcs-client.so -lSM -lICE -lX11
/usr/lib64/libxfce4util.so -lglib-2.0
gdk-pixbuf-csource --raw --build-list                           \
xfcalendar_icon ./xfcalendar.png > xfcalendar-icon-inline.h
failed to load "./xfcalendar.png": Unable to load image-loading module:
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so:
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [xfcalendar-icon-inline.h] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/scratch/jjensen/rpmbuildspace/BUILD/xfcalendar-0.1.6/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

Ehem... do I see a case of a hardcoded "/usr/lib" here?  Shouldn't
"/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so" be
"/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so" ???


=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 joshmule - 2004-04-08 21:31 GMT 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
When I say "other packages will at least prefer the /usr/lib version of
things"... I only see this with
/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so from the 32 bit gtk2
package.  However, when I do "rpm -e gtk2-2.2.4-4.0.i386" and rebuild, the
resulting rpm's only report a need for 64bit .so libs:

[jjensen at salute x86_64]$ rpm -qp *rpm --requires | grep .so | grep -v
"64bit" | wc -l
      0

So I think it may just be a case of libpixbufloader-png.so's path being
hard-coded.  Hope this helps

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 olivier - 2004-04-09 06:12 GMT 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
We really don't hardcode anything; the error is caused by the command:

gdk-pixbuf-csource --raw --build-list \
xfcalendar_icon ./xfcalendar.png > xfcalendar-icon-inline.h

and "gdk-pixbuf-csource" ships with gtk, so it's the gtk package that is
broken, not xfcalendar (although I agree that the header should be
provided, so if there is a problem with our package here, it's a missing
header)

BTW, check your gtk package.

Olivier.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 huysmans - 2004-04-13 15:11 GMT 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
can this be closed?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 joshmule - 2004-04-13 23:30 GMT 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes... go ahead and close this.

I've entered bugs with Gnome and Red Hat about this:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139987

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120795

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 huysmans - 2004-04-14 06:03 GMT 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Closing. Gtk bug.