[Xfce-bugs] [XFCE 0000168]: keyboard extra keys problem

[xfce-bugs at xfce.org]

A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
=======================================================================
http://bugs.xfce.org/view_bug_page.php?f_id=168
=======================================================================
Reporter:                   poe
Handler:                    
=======================================================================
Project:                    XFCE
Bug ID:                     0000168
Category:                   xfwm
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   block
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
=======================================================================
Date Submitted:             2004-04-05 08:49 GMT
Last Modified:              2004-04-05 11:09 GMT
=======================================================================
Summary:                    keyboard extra keys problem
Description: 
look at bug http://bugs.xfce.org/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0000147. " Nothing
changed in this matter. As if xev doesn't return the keysym, then you're
missign a couple of xmodmap definitions."

But xev doesn't show keysyms _ONLY_ when xfwm4-4.0.4 is running.  When I
shut it down, or launch 4.0.3.1 everything (xev, and keys) is fine. So it
_is_ a problem with xfwm. I have Logitech Internet ("XkbModel" "logiik")
keyboard. 
=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 olivier - 2004-04-05 11:08 GMT 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do those keys get defineD? Do you you have an xmodmap somewhere? If
not, I don't see how such special keys can be known.

And you you have xmodmap definitions, where are they defined?  What if you
run it from an terminal?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 olivier - 2004-04-05 11:09 GMT 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
oh, and it's really not a "blocking" problem, come on!