[Thunar-dev] samba

[Kresimir Spes]

> Bob Snyder wrote:
>
>   
>> Auke Kok wrote:
>>  
>>
>>     
>>> Why do people think that implementing a specific way to do X (in this case, 
>>> mount a samba share or browse it, which is basically the same) should beling in 
>>> a filemanager?
>>>    
>>>
>>>       
>> Because xffm/xfsamba did it?
>>
>>
>> Bob S.
>>  
>>
>>     
In my opinion, it's much better to use fusesmb or smbmount because then 
you can see your shares in every unix app, and you can benefit from 
caching etc.
I wasn't aware of fusesmb so that's why I asked for this feature, but 
since I found fusesmb, I withdraw my request :) what's the real 
diffenrence in going to "smb://share" or going to ~/smb/share?

Kresimir