[Thunar-dev] Thunar Extension Framework
botsie at xfce.org
Wed Sep 14 08:06:48 CEST 2005
Tim Tassonis wrote:
> Still, a "simple" file manager, as thunar is supposed to be, should work
> with files, as provided by the operating system vfs interface. I think
> the FUSE approach is the right one, it is not the job of a simple
> filemanager to provide a separate, better vfs layer. I hope xfce4 is not
> turning into an alternative GNOME/KDE beast and thunar not into
> nautilus/konqueror because GNOME/KDE already exist. I always thought
> xfce is supposed to be an alternative for people that like to do without
> all that additional, costly stuff. A separate vfs layer certainly would
> go into that direction.
Well, in xfce we've never followed the approach of "avoid features in
order to avoid bloat". Fluxbox et al do a better job of that approach
I think our approach has always been "balance features and bloat and
always do it the *right* way"
It has worked well thus far and hopefully will continue to do so.
More information about the Thunar-dev