[Thunar-dev] GConf? [WAS Re: Problems building new Thunar snapshot]
fourdan at xfce.org
Sat Nov 12 10:31:59 CET 2005
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 10:08 +0100, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> All this is nice, and I understand that the feature is neat and useful,
> etc. but I can't imagine that a component part of Xfce would depend on
> GNOME by default.
> Frankly, if you drag GNOME by default as a dependency, then we'd better
> use nautilus as a file manager, so we get a full featured, stable,
> proven file manager...
> Would you imagine Konqueror depending on GConf by default?
Oh well, whatever, you're right, I give up, I don't care.
Forget it, we'll see when it's done, as long as there is a way to
More information about the Thunar-dev