[Thunar-dev] Clearance
Benedikt Meurer
benedikt.meurer at unix-ag.uni-siegen.de
Thu Jun 2 12:51:22 CEST 2005
Auke Kok wrote:
>>>>>>It would be a shame if the project were to fork. Forks are often a waste of
>>>>>>resources, especially at such an early stage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't know what you mean with "serious development attempts", but I'd
>>>>>>like to
>>>>>>update the python-ui-demo with some simplifications, to see what the
>>>>>>other guys
>>>>>>think.
>>>>>
>>>>>that would require either svn access (thunar-cvs is offline). This still
>>>>>reminds me that thunar needs to be migrated properly to SVN. Benny: do
>>>>>you want it outside or in the Xfce repo?
>>>>
>>>>There's not much to import yet. People seem to expect to see source code
>>>>there, so let's wait until we have some source code.
>>>
>>>well the mockups are only accessible now through your snapshots. My idea
>>>was to migrate THAT to svn. That will give you at least a (empty) place
>>>to point at on the website ;^), and people can perhaps toy with the
>>>python mockups themselves.
>>
>>Btw. the thunar CVS is still online, atleast I was able to commit
>>recently. I'm ok with importing the thunar CVS module into the svn
>>repository.
>
> yes, but the CVS repo isn't accessible through anoncvs. Hence the
> suggestion. I'll start moving it today and let everyone know the new
> locations and access points. When you say "importing into" do you mean
> "in Xfce's SVN" ? There's nothing against putting it outside of Xfce for
> me. Might even be preferrable.
I don't care, depends whether the Xfce people consider it a core module
or not.
> sofar
greets,
Benedikt
More information about the Thunar-dev
mailing list