From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Tue Oct 3 14:00:13 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:00:13 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13877] It is not possible to change weather forecast location anymore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13877 Szymon Siwek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |slsiwek+xfce at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Szymon Siwek --- Created attachment 7341 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7341&action=edit setting user agent (required by http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org) It seems we have to set proper user agent: ```

Access blocked

You have been blocked because you have violated the usage policy of OSM's Nominatim geocoding service. ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Wed Oct 4 08:10:30 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 06:10:30 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 4766] quicklaunch causes xfce4-panel to crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4766 Rion changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rion4ik at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Rion --- I think quicklaunch should be deprecated in favor of whiskermenu. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Thu Oct 5 21:21:23 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 19:21:23 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13901] New: Do not change the location when you press the change button Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13901 Bug ID: 13901 Summary: Do not change the location when you press the change button Classification: Panel Plugins Product: Xfce4-weather-plugin Version: 0.8.9 Hardware: PC (x86_64) OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Medium Component: General Assignee: hjudt at xfce.org Reporter: ruben.campotejar at hotmail.com CC: goodies-dev at xfce.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 7343 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7343&action=edit A photo of the broken search engine When within properties you want to change a location and choose the one you like most does not let you do it. You can not choose any location -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Thu Oct 5 21:23:05 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 19:23:05 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13901] Do not change the location when you press the change button In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13901 Rubén changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|Medium |High Severity|normal |major -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Fri Oct 6 21:34:53 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 19:34:53 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13853] Shows no activity on OpenBSD 6.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13853 Landry Breuil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|frivoal at xfce.org |landry at xfce.org --- Comment #10 from Landry Breuil --- Created attachment 7345 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7345&action=edit simpler (?) fix So, i finally had time to properly look into this bug, as it puzzled me - there's indeed a problem on the kernel side where sysctl() doesnt null-terminate some strings but for specific drivers. This is a separate issue that has to be dealt with. But in the end, sdl_nlen should be used - it is correctly used in fact in checkinterface() (here: https://git.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-netload-plugin/tree/panel-plugin/wormulon/openbsd.c#n80) , but *not* in get_stats() when the interface name check is done *before* uselessly copying it to s (in https://git.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-netload-plugin/tree/panel-plugin/wormulon/openbsd.c#n152). So yes, your second patch works and fixes the issue, but there's a simpler solution to me: only fix get_stats, and compare the right strings at the right moment - which is what your first patch did more or less. Whether checking for nlen > 0 is needed is separate (and cargo-culting code from netstat isnt a reason :) - using IFNAMSIZ also makes sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sat Oct 7 21:37:47 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 19:37:47 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13906] New: Configure "Text to display" label color Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906 Bug ID: 13906 Summary: Configure "Text to display" label color Classification: Panel Plugins Product: Xfce4-netload-plugin Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Medium Component: General Assignee: frivoal at xfce.org Reporter: mikeus at hotmail.ru QA Contact: goodies-dev at xfce.org Target Milestone: --- The label for "Text to display" on the Xfce panel inherits its color from a GTK+3 theme. It becomes unreadable when the label's text color from the theme and and the color of the Xfce panel background that can be tuned from the panel's preferences fall close together. Please add an option for choosing the font color of the displayed text. Or please, give the GTK widget name to the label to allow to refer to it from a user CSS file (https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkWidget.html#gtk-widget-set-name) as it has been done for panel toggle buttons of the power manager and pulseaudio plugins that are also have been shifted to GTK+3. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Mon Oct 9 22:54:49 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 20:54:49 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13877] It is not possible to change weather forecast location anymore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13877 Simon Steinbeiss changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ochosi at xfce.org --- Comment #3 from Simon Steinbeiss --- (In reply to Szymon Siwek from comment #2) > Created attachment 7341 [details] > setting user agent (required by http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org) > > It seems we have to set proper user agent: Yes, that makes a lot of sense, especially after reading the docs. However trying your patch doesn't fix the problem for me here. My guess is that we have overused the nominatim quota. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Tue Oct 10 17:19:47 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:19:47 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13877] It is not possible to change weather forecast location anymore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13877 --- Comment #4 from Git Bot --- Szymon Siwek referenced this bugreport in commit 7c976663e8790e5b06ca31a4a3165b11aeb89f11 Set USER_AGENT for nominatim search (bug #13877) https://git.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-weather-plugin/commit?id=7c976663e8790e5b06ca31a4a3165b11aeb89f11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Tue Oct 10 17:22:42 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:22:42 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13877] It is not possible to change weather forecast location anymore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13877 --- Comment #5 from Harald Judt --- Pushed as it makes sense and makes it work for me. I will make a new release this week or the next. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Tue Oct 10 18:35:05 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:35:05 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13914] New: Massive amounts of syscalls Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13914 Bug ID: 13914 Summary: Massive amounts of syscalls Classification: Panel Plugins Product: Xfce4-systemload-plugin Version: unspecified Hardware: PC (x86_64) OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Medium Component: General Assignee: goodies-dev at xfce.org Reporter: davidnwelton at gmail.com QA Contact: goodies-dev at xfce.org Target Milestone: --- This plugin generates a ton of syscalls, which ends up causing intel_powerclamp to fire if I'm doing anything else that's reasonably processor intensive. Here's a sample: 09:33:07.459139 writev(3, [{"H\2$\0j\365\240\1\22\0\240\1\5\0\6\0\0\0\0\0\0 \240\1,,,:\1\1\1\r"..., 3440}, {NULL, 0}, {"", 0}], 3) = 3440 09:33:07.459587 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}]) 09:33:07.459639 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"A\0\205\33o\365\240\1\3\0\202\0\17\0\240\1\0\0\7\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 64 09:33:07.459695 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.459808 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}]) 09:33:07.459856 writev(3, [{"H\2$\0q\365\240\1\22\0\240\1\5\0\6\0\0\0\0\0\0 \240\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 520}, {NULL, 0}, {"", 0}], 3) = 520 09:33:07.460068 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}]) 09:33:07.460113 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"\1 \227\33\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\f\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 4096}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 32 09:33:07.460158 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.460194 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.460292 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}]) 09:33:07.460333 writev(3, [{"H\2.\0u\365\240\1\22\0\240\1\5\0\10\0\0\0\0\0\0 \240\1%%%6\0\0\0\r"..., 560}, {NULL, 0}, {"", 0}], 3) = 560 09:33:07.460550 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}]) 09:33:07.460594 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"\1 \247\33\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\f\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 4096}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 32 09:33:07.460636 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.460670 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.461179 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}]) 09:33:07.461237 writev(3, [{"H\2$\0y\365\240\1\22\0\240\1\5\0\6\0\0\0\0\0\0 \240\1,,,:\1\1\1\r"..., 3440}, {NULL, 0}, {"", 0}], 3) = 3440 09:33:07.461671 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}]) 09:33:07.461716 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"A\0\304\33~\365\240\1\3\0\202\0\17\0\240\1\0\0\7\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 64 09:33:07.461763 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.461870 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}]) 09:33:07.461912 writev(3, [{"H\2$\0\200\365\240\1\22\0\240\1\5\0\6\0\0\0\0\0\0 \240\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 520}, {NULL, 0}, {"", 0}], 3) = 520 09:33:07.462107 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}]) 09:33:07.462148 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"\1 \326\33\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\f\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 4096}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 32 09:33:07.462208 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.462242 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.462344 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}]) 09:33:07.462389 writev(3, [{"H\2.\0\204\365\240\1\22\0\240\1\5\0\10\0\0\0\0\0\0 \240\1%%%6\0\0\0\r"..., 560}, {NULL, 0}, {"", 0}], 3) = 560 09:33:07.462588 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}]) 09:33:07.462627 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"\1 \346\33\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\f\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 4096}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 32 09:33:07.462669 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.462706 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.463053 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5, events=POLLIN}], 3, 0) = 0 (Timeout) 09:33:07.463120 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}]) 09:33:07.463162 writev(3, [{"H\2$\0\210\365\240\1\22\0\240\1\5\0\6\0\0\0\0\0\0 \240\1,,,:\1\1\1\r"..., 1728}, {NULL, 0}, {"", 0}], 3) = 1728 09:33:07.463471 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290e5d0, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.463511 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290e700, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.463548 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=5, events=POLLIN}], 3, 0) = 0 (Timeout) 09:33:07.464316 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}]) 09:33:07.464373 writev(3, [{"5 \4\0\214\365\240\1\3\0\240\1q\0\32\0\213\4\6\0\215\365\240\1\214\365\240\1&\0\0\0"..., 792}, {NULL, 0}, {"", 0}], 3) = 792 09:33:07.464647 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}]) 09:33:07.464693 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"A\0\16\34\217\365\240\1\3\0\202\0\17\0\240\1\0\0\7\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4096}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 64 09:33:07.464742 recvmsg(3, 0x7ffd0290a310, 0) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) 09:33:07.464857 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}]) 09:33:07.464903 writev(3, [{"H\2$\0\221\365\240\1\22\0\240\1\5\0\6\0\0\0\0\0\0 \240\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 520}, {NULL, 0}, {"", 0}], 3) = 520 09:33:07.465120 poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}]) 09:33:07.465163 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"\1 \34\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\f\3\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 4096}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Tue Oct 10 18:35:35 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:35:35 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13914] Massive amounts of syscalls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13914 David N. Welton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davidnwelton at gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Wed Oct 11 22:22:21 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:22:21 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13877] It is not possible to change weather forecast location anymore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13877 Harald Judt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Harald Judt --- Released 0.8.10. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Wed Oct 11 22:33:06 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 20:33:06 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13551] Temperature display truncated In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13551 Harald Judt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Harald Judt --- Yes, you have to increase the number of rows for the plugin to display correctly in deskbar mode. You will find that many other plugins in this mode will not be displayed correctly, so maybe you can find a better configuration that works for you? Maybe use the panel intelligent hiding feature to gain screen space. Closing this as won't fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Thu Oct 12 19:04:59 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:04:59 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13588] Measure disk performance on nvme SSD drive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13588 Paul-Antoine Arras changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |listes at defendingthemusic.fr --- Comment #2 from Paul-Antoine Arras --- Created attachment 7353 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7353&action=edit lspci -vvv Output of `lspci -vvv` as root on Dell Precision 7710 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Thu Oct 12 19:10:57 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:10:57 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13588] Measure disk performance on nvme SSD drive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13588 --- Comment #3 from Paul-Antoine Arras --- Created attachment 7354 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7354&action=edit /proc/partitions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Thu Oct 12 19:45:55 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:45:55 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13915] New: Fix build with clang for enum type GtkOrientation and XfcePanelPluginMode Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13915 Bug ID: 13915 Summary: Fix build with clang for enum type GtkOrientation and XfcePanelPluginMode Classification: Panel Plugins Product: Xfce4-weather-plugin Version: 0.8.10 Hardware: Other OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Medium Component: General Assignee: hjudt at xfce.org Reporter: duchateau.olivier at gmail.com CC: goodies-dev at xfce.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 7355 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7355&action=edit Fix enum type between GtkOrientation and XfcePanelPluginMode Under FreeBSD with clang, it's default compiler (but also noticed on Fedora 26 with gcc 7.2.1) I get this message when I build xfce4-weather-plugin: weather.c:2035:31: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'XfcePanelPluginMode' to different enumeration type 'GtkOrientation' [-Wenum-conversion] data->panel_orientation = xfce_panel_plugin_get_mode(panel); ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ weather.c:2038:34: warning: comparison of constant 'XFCE_PANEL_PLUGIN_MODE_DESKBAR' (2) with expression of type 'GtkOrientation' is always false [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare] (data->panel_orientation == XFCE_PANEL_PLUGIN_MODE_DESKBAR && ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I suggest to use xfce_panel_plugin_get_orientation() function. It returns GtkOrientation type (GTK_ORIENTATION_HORIZONTAL or GTK_ORIENTATION_VERTICAL). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Thu Oct 12 23:53:07 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 21:53:07 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13588] Measure disk performance on nvme SSD drive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13588 --- Comment #4 from Paul-Antoine Arras --- OK, this is actually fixed in 2.6.1. See Bug 13281. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Fri Oct 13 20:34:26 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:34:26 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13588] Measure disk performance on nvme SSD drive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13588 thecatlover1996 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from thecatlover1996 at gmail.com --- That should indeed fix it. I'll wait till Ubuntu 18.04 LTS comes out before I can verify that it works (this app is stuck at version 2.5.5 in Ubuntu 16.04), but since this report is duplicate, it can be closed :) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 13281 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Fri Oct 13 20:34:26 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:34:26 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13281] Unable to get performance statistics for devices with major number > 255 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13281 thecatlover1996 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thecatlover1996 at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from thecatlover1996 at gmail.com --- *** Bug 13588 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sat Oct 14 10:25:13 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 08:25:13 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13922] New: Wrong colors Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13922 Bug ID: 13922 Summary: Wrong colors Classification: Panel Plugins Product: Xfce4-mpc-plugin Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Medium Component: General Assignee: landry at xfce.org Reporter: alexyecu at gmail.com QA Contact: goodies-dev at xfce.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 7366 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7366&action=edit Wrong colors, several plugins affected Plugin does not take correct color from theme, when the panel is pale-grey, plugin's background is dark-grey/black. Affected several plugins: mpc, date and time, netload, genmon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sat Oct 14 10:27:27 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 08:27:27 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13922] Wrong colors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13922 --- Comment #1 from Alexander --- Should I create bugs for all affected plugins? Bug looks the same. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 15 17:37:07 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 15:37:07 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 12124] Patch to make icons change color based on cpu frequency In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12124 Gert Wollny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #6407|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #1 from Gert Wollny --- Created attachment 7371 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7371&action=edit Updated patch against 1.1.3 This is an updated patch. Now the colour coding is stored in a g_hash_table with the key being ( cpu frequency >> 16 ). Best, Gert -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Wed Oct 18 21:25:31 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:25:31 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13922] Wrong colors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13922 --- Comment #2 from Landry Breuil --- I dont have that issue here, so i guess it depends on your theme... using greybird here, works fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Wed Oct 18 21:38:29 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:38:29 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13782] Free Space Checker waking up autofs mounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13782 Landry Breuil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |landry at xfce.org --- Comment #1 from Landry Breuil --- The plugin doesnt spawn df, it directly uses statfs() function to guery the available space on the path you gave it - see https://git.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-fsguard-plugin/tree/panel-plugin/fsguard.c#n272 I dont use linux so i dont have the usecase for autofs, but i see where you're coming from. I don't think adding an option for this would make sense, someone just needs to add a bit of code to see if fsguard->path is mounted before calling statfs(). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Wed Oct 18 21:40:08 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:40:08 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 4766] quicklaunch causes xfce4-panel to crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4766 Landry Breuil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |landry at xfce.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Landry Breuil --- quicklauncher is dead/unmaintained. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Wed Oct 18 21:48:53 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:48:53 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13906] Configure "Text to display" label color In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13906 Landry Breuil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED CC| |landry at xfce.org --- Comment #1 from Landry Breuil --- Should be fixed by https://git.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-netload-plugin/commit/panel-plugin/netload.c?id=9e2ab3d7ae6943a5d0c9a076531aeebc77f5080d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Wed Oct 18 22:17:48 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:17:48 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13922] Wrong colors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13922 --- Comment #3 from Alexander --- (In reply to Landry Breuil from comment #2) > I dont have that issue here, so i guess it depends on your theme... using > greybird here, works fine. The problem is: different panel plugins use different color ID for the same element. Looks like this. So, the problem is not in theme. May be Greybird has the same color for different IDs (for example, 'background selected' and 'backgrond highlated'). In xfce4-slate theme the problem persists. So, may be that'll be enough check bacground color ID in weather, tray or windows switcher plugin (correct colors) and check the same in four plugins in first post. I guess the IDs differ. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Wed Oct 18 22:26:13 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:26:13 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13922] Wrong colors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13922 --- Comment #4 from Landry Breuil --- At least in mpc (which i wrote, i only sort of co-maintain datetime and netload) i do nothing specific to the background, there's no 'background color id' or css class applied to the background widget to my knowledge... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Wed Oct 18 22:43:59 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:43:59 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13922] Wrong colors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13922 --- Comment #5 from Alexander --- >At least in mpc (which i wrote, i only sort of co-maintain datetime and netload) i do nothing >specific to the background, there's no 'background color id' or css class applied to the >background widget to my knowledge... CSS? What engine does the plugin use? GTK3 and not GTK2? xfce4 4.12 uses GTK2, at least in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Thu Oct 19 07:58:58 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 05:58:58 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13922] Wrong colors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13922 --- Comment #6 from Landry Breuil --- I stand corrected, be it with gtk2 or gtk3, in the mpc code, there's nothing specific being done about the styling (just look at the code), so the theme colors should just apply.... and mpc plugin uses gtk3 since 0.5.0. Ask the xfce4-slate theme developer ? But from what im seeing on your screenshot, that looks like a theme issue where it's only written for a version of gtk and doesnt support multiple versions - have you tried with other themes ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Thu Oct 19 18:49:20 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:49:20 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13922] Wrong colors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13922 --- Comment #7 from Alexander --- Looks like mpc pluging (and all with problem) takes colors from gtk3 themes, and most of panel plugins uses gtk2 settings. All themes affected. Look at theese screenshots: https://ibb.co/k9245m https://ibb.co/dnqfd6 GTK2 theme is oxygen-gtk and GTK3 theme is Breeze. Sylphhed, xfce4-panel and most of xfce4-panel plugins (tray, window switcher, window mwnu, clock, timer, weather, cpu monitor) use colors of GTK2 theme. EasyStroke and some plugins (mpc, netmon, getmon) use colors of GTK3 theme. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Thu Oct 19 19:16:04 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:16:04 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13922] Wrong colors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13922 --- Comment #8 from Landry Breuil --- Well, that's... expected. Unless you have a single unified theme that does both Gtk2 and Gtk3, you cant decide which plugin uses which theme, the Gtk3 plugins will use the Gtk3 theme and the Gtk2 plugins will use the Gtk2 theme. In your case i suppose your distro updated some plugins to their Gtk3 version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sat Oct 21 00:16:54 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 22:16:54 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] New: diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 Bug ID: 13940 Summary: diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) Classification: Panel Plugins Product: Xfce4-diskperf-plugin Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Medium Component: General Assignee: goodies-dev at xfce.org Reporter: mgorny at gentoo.org QA Contact: goodies-dev at xfce.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 7377 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7377&action=edit 0001-Add-sys-sysmacros.h-include-required-for-glibc-2.25.patch When building against glibc-2.25+: devperf.c: In function ‘DevGetPerfData1’: devperf.c:65:32: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘major’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] const int iMajorNo = major(p_iDevice), ^ devperf.c:66:13: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘minor’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] iMinorNo = minor(p_iDevice); ^ devperf.c:69:21: error: ‘major’ redeclared as different kind of symbol unsigned int major, minor, rsect, wsect, ruse, wuse, use; ^ devperf.c:65:32: note: previous implicit declaration of ‘major’ was here const int iMajorNo = major(p_iDevice), ^ devperf.c:69:28: error: ‘minor’ redeclared as different kind of symbol unsigned int major, minor, rsect, wsect, ruse, wuse, use; ^ devperf.c:66:13: note: previous implicit declaration of ‘minor’ was here iMinorNo = minor(p_iDevice); ^ devperf.c:87:2: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fscanf’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result] fscanf (pF, "%*s"); /* Skip device name */ ^ This version of glibc no longer implicitly includes major/minor macros via other headers. It requires using for that explicitly (it also works on BSD). I'm attaching a patch fixing the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sat Oct 21 12:18:22 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 10:18:22 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13942] New: Unable to change text color Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942 Bug ID: 13942 Summary: Unable to change text color Classification: Panel Plugins Product: Xfce4-genmon-plugin Version: unspecified Hardware: PC (x86_64) OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Medium Component: General Assignee: frivoal at xfce.org Reporter: contact at sebastian-joseph.de QA Contact: goodies-dev at xfce.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 7379 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7379&action=edit Shows the panel bug, the settings with command 'echo test' and the gtk.css with sample CSS-rule I tried this plugin and noticed the colors don't match the color of the other panel components. I tried to change the color using the ~/.config/gtk-3.0/gtk.css even by applying the sample styling mentioned in https://git.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-genmon-plugin/tree/CSS%20Styling.txt but the color didn't change. I'm using the Arc theme: https://github.com/horst3180/arc-theme Panel version: 4.12.1 Genmon plugin version: 4.0.0 GTK 3 version: 3.22.24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sat Oct 21 22:02:59 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 20:02:59 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 Skunnyk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skunnyk at xfce.org Version|unspecified |git Target Milestone|--- |upcoming --- Comment #1 from Skunnyk --- With glibc 2.26: devperf.c: In function ‘DevGetPerfData1’: devperf.c:65:13: warning: In the GNU C Library, "major" is defined by . For historical compatibility, it is currently defined by as well, but we plan to remove this soon. To use "major", include directly. If you did not intend to use a system-defined macro "major", you should undefine it after including . const int iMajorNo = major(p_iDevice), ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I can confirm that the patch fix the problem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sat Oct 21 22:05:30 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 20:05:30 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 Landry Breuil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |landry at xfce.org --- Comment #2 from Landry Breuil --- OpenBSD doesn't have sysmacros.h :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sat Oct 21 22:06:59 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 20:06:59 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 --- Comment #3 from Landry Breuil --- I'd rather have this within a #ifdef _SOMETHING_GLIBC but the patch is fine otherwise -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sat Oct 21 22:08:02 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 20:08:02 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 --- Comment #4 from Landry Breuil --- Only freebsd has one in its source tree (cf http://bxr.su/search?q=&defs=&refs=&path=sysmacros.h) and it's not even installed, so yeah only for GLIBC that is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 22 00:07:36 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 22:07:36 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 Michał Górny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #7377|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #5 from Michał Górny --- Created attachment 7382 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7382&action=edit 0001-Support-sys-sysmacros.h-include-required-for-glibc-2.patch How about this one? It adds a configure check, so I guess it's the safest option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 22 08:14:14 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 06:14:14 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 --- Comment #6 from Landry Breuil --- Right, that's a valid option... but if we know that only glibc has this behaviour (what about musl libc ?) i'd have thought about #if defined(__GLIBC__), but i dont even know if that's the canonical way to detect glibc.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 22 08:27:02 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 06:27:02 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 --- Comment #7 from Landry Breuil --- My point being if sysmacros.h is needed only for glibc > 2.25, it should be included only in this case :) otherwise it's context pollution... but that's not a huge deal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 22 08:29:43 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 06:29:43 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 --- Comment #8 from Landry Breuil --- So maybe #if defined(__GLIBC__) && __GLIBC__ > 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__ > 25, if that works for you.. assuming that if __GLIBC__ is defined, then __GLIBC_MINOR__ is defined too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 22 09:41:18 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 07:41:18 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 --- Comment #9 from Michał Górny --- I think Gentoo has been backporting this patch to older versions, so I'd rather not rely on specific versions. The autoconf variant is relatively safe, and should not require any further work once other libcs follow suit. After all, the rationale makes sense -- major() and minor() names are very collision-prone, so they should not be included along with commonly used stuff. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Mon Oct 23 18:16:58 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:16:58 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 --- Comment #10 from Landry Breuil --- Oh, but you mean sys/sysmacros.h is a *new* header that appeared with this glib version ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Tue Oct 24 07:49:38 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 05:49:38 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13940] diskperf-plugin: missing include (fails to build w/ glibc-2.25+) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13940 --- Comment #11 from Michał Górny --- No, it was always there. Previously it was included implicitly, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sat Oct 28 20:09:00 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 18:09:00 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13957] New: Bar style inconsistent with other plugins Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13957 Bug ID: 13957 Summary: Bar style inconsistent with other plugins Classification: Panel Plugins Product: Xfce4-genmon-plugin Version: unspecified Hardware: PC (x86_64) OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Medium Component: General Assignee: frivoal at xfce.org Reporter: fizulg at fake-box.com QA Contact: goodies-dev at xfce.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 7395 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7395&action=edit Screenshot of systemload, netload and genmod bars, in both adwaita and arc-darker themes As seen in the screenshot, the bar style (two on the right) is inconsistent with the bars in the systemload (left) and netload(middle) plugins. Is it wider and starts from the top instead of the bottom. Additionally there is a visible gap at the top and bottom, even when set to 100. This is especially noticable in dark themes, but affects all themes i tested, including xfce provided ones. plugin version: 4.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 29 03:09:27 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 02:09:27 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13957] Bar style inconsistent with other plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13957 ToZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tony.paulic at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from ToZ --- Created attachment 7396 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7396&action=edit Image Interesting. I fixed the bar direction issue in this commit: https://git.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-genmon-plugin/commit/panel-plugin?id=a41e75b468abb9ae80a1d4207af7e37338e59144 but it doesn't seem to have made it into 4.0.0. The gaps have been fixed since the last release. I have also enhanced CSS styling (https://git.xfce.org/panel-plugins/xfce4-genmon-plugin/tree/CSS%20Styling.txt) but this still hasn't been released. With this styling, it is easier to do something like this: .genmon_progressbar trough { min-height: 2px; min-width: 2px; } .genmon_progressbar progress { min-height: 2px; min-width: 2px; } .genmon_progressbar { margin: 2px; } to get a similar styling with say the netload plugin with the Adwiata theme (see attached image). Perhaps its time to do another release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 29 06:04:53 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 05:04:53 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13958] New: Black Text with Dark Themes Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13958 Bug ID: 13958 Summary: Black Text with Dark Themes Classification: Panel Plugins Product: Xfce4-verve-plugin Version: 1.0.0 Hardware: PC (x86_64) OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Medium Component: General Assignee: frivoal at xfce.org Reporter: djh_101 at yahoo.com QA Contact: goodies-dev at xfce.org Target Milestone: --- I am currently using a dark theme which renders the Verve background black. The text starts out white but as soon as focus is lost it turns black. The issue seems to be the line, gtk_widget_modify_text (verve->input, GTK_STATE_NORMAL, &style->text[GTK_STATE_SELECTED]); in verve-plugin.c (function verve_plugin_focus_timeout_reset); though the default style has the correct font, the default style that Verve gets reset to after focus loss does not. (Also, as a side note, most of the styling functions in use seem to be deprecated.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 29 06:05:38 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 05:05:38 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13958] Black Text with Dark Themes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13958 djh_101 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |minor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 29 09:19:56 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 08:19:56 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13958] Black Text with Dark Themes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13958 --- Comment #1 from djh_101 at yahoo.com --- Possible Solution: Remove the modify_bg and modify_text lines. It seems that without the modify_base line the plugin's style will not change on blur (i.e. it will retain the blue border that appears on focus and the cursor caret will remain present) resulting in it appearing to be focused even when it isn't. The modify_base line fixes this by removing the border and cursor while the modify_bg and modify_text lines don't appear to be doing anything aside from inadvertently turning white text black. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Sun Oct 29 20:46:23 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 19:46:23 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 8874] background color for verve panel plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8874 swordplay at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |swordplay at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from swordplay at gmail.com --- (In reply to grepper from comment #0) > It would be nice if you could set the background color of the command line > box. Pure white upsets the look and continuity of for example, a > transparent panel. > > thanks for a great plugin, > grepper I find that the background reverts to white after use. Usually I then get dark text, but sometimes I get light text and that makes it unreadable. I use a dark theme. I would prefer for verve to remain with light text on the dark background, matching the theme. Is this something I can configure manually, assuming that there will be a wait for consistent theming? Aloha, and thank you for all your hard work! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Mon Oct 30 11:40:08 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:40:08 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13942] Unable to change text color In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942 ToZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tony.paulic at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from ToZ --- Created attachment 7399 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7399&action=edit image Using your same snippet here works for me. See attached image. Is there something else in your css file that may be overriding it? Can you post back your complete gtk.css file? Can also try with a new user profile? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Mon Oct 30 17:22:14 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:22:14 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13942] Unable to change text color In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942 --- Comment #2 from ToZ --- Sorry, my bad. The CSS styling enhancements weren't available in 4.0.0 (I'm running 4.0.1). I've just released 4.0.1 where it is included. Can you give that version a try? To get something similar with 4.0.0, you could try: #genmon-1>widget>box>box>label { color: rgb(255,0,0); font-size: 8px; padding-top: 4px; } ...where "#genmon-1" is the actual name of your genmon plugin that you can get from hovering your mouse over the name in the panel properties, Items tab. Note that the '#' is mandatory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Mon Oct 30 17:22:30 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:22:30 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13942] Unable to change text color In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13942 ToZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Mon Oct 30 17:28:48 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:28:48 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 3437] Allow on-click action on the displayed text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3437 ToZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED --- Comment #10 from ToZ --- This enhancement was released in version 3.99 (GTK3 only). Resolving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Mon Oct 30 17:31:48 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:31:48 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 9238] broken tooltip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9238 ToZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tony.paulic at gmail.com Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from ToZ --- Resolving this ticket as this would be a limitation with the GTK toolkit and not with the code here. Feel free to re-open if you disagree. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Mon Oct 30 17:34:31 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:34:31 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13957] Bar style inconsistent with other plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13957 ToZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #2 from ToZ --- I have released version 4.0.1. Please give that version a try with the css above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Mon Oct 30 21:00:23 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:00:23 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13957] Bar style inconsistent with other plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13957 --- Comment #3 from fizulg at fake-box.com --- Created attachment 7401 --> https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7401&action=edit Screenshot of systemload, netload and improved genmon bars, in modified arc-darker theme Yes, that works perfectly, even with arc. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Mon Oct 30 23:25:52 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:25:52 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13957] Bar style inconsistent with other plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13957 ToZ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from ToZ --- Closing report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Tue Oct 31 00:13:52 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 23:13:52 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 8874] background color for verve panel plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8874 djh_101 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djh_101 at yahoo.com --- Comment #3 from djh_101 at yahoo.com --- (In reply to swordplay from comment #2) > (In reply to grepper from comment #0) > > It would be nice if you could set the background color of the command line > > box. Pure white upsets the look and continuity of for example, a > > transparent panel. > > > > thanks for a great plugin, > > grepper > > I find that the background reverts to white after use. Usually I then get > dark text, but sometimes I get light text and that makes it unreadable. > > I use a dark theme. I would prefer for verve to remain with light text on > the dark background, matching the theme. > > Is this something I can configure manually, assuming that there will be a > wait for consistent theming? > > Aloha, and thank you for all your hard work! You can use my fork: https://github.com/djh101/xfce4-verve-plugin. I removed two lines that were reverting the font and background color to some "default" value on focus loss which was causing my white font (on a black background) to turn black. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org Tue Oct 31 10:59:57 2017 From: bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org (bugzilla-daemon at xfce.org) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:59:57 +0000 Subject: [Goodies-dev] [Bug 13963] New: Values not removed when interface becomes inactive Message-ID: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13963 Bug ID: 13963 Summary: Values not removed when interface becomes inactive Classification: Panel Plugins Product: Xfce4-netload-plugin Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: Medium Component: General Assignee: frivoal at xfce.org Reporter: denis.prost at wanadoo.fr QA Contact: goodies-dev at xfce.org Target Milestone: --- At home, ppp0 is active and throughput values are displayed for this interface. Then I suspend my computer, and go to work where my internet interface is wlan0 and there is no more active ppp0 interface. Though, the ppp0 netload plugin still displays "0.00 Kio" instead of showing "-" for these values, like it is after restarting the computer. This is with xfce4-netload-plugin 1:1.2.4-0mx150+1 (on the MX 16.1, Debian Jessie based linux distro) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.