How to get to the Xfce 4.4 website
nickschermer at gmail.com
Tue Jan 10 21:10:15 CET 2006
On 1/10/06, Brian J. Tarricone <bjt23 at cornell.edu> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 1/10/2006 10:49 AM, Nick Schermer wrote:
> > On 1/10/06, Alexander Toresson <alexander.toresson at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>I agree with all the others. It's a great design. I've just got one
> >>question: Is the page resolution independent? That is, does it use the
> >>full width of your browser window, or is it static width?
> > I was thinking of both :). 780px and 100%. Enough space in the header
> > a small buttun :P.
> >> I'm asking because I've seen just too many pages on the net that are
> >> static width, and therefore just use a part of your full horizontal
> >> resolution on monitors that are reasonably high resolution (1600x1200,
> >> 1680x1050 etc).
> > Yes, but it's hard to design and in most cases a website "designed" for
> > 780px is a but ugly in 1600px. But i'll give it a shot.
> Yuck. This is just lazy, IMHO. I did my site's layout entirely using
> 'em's. It's not that hard and will scale to any monitor/font-size
> combo. The real killer here is the font size: people on 1600x1200
> monitors will likely not be using 12pt fonts in their browser, and if
> you force the font size to be 12pt, it'll be painful to read. Use 'em's
> only, please.
Maybe 3 font sizes? and i use em's.. okay :).
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Xfce4-dev mailing list
> Xfce4-dev at xfce.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Xfce4-dev