Settings manager pluguns reloading patch
Benedikt.Meurer at unix-ag.uni-siegen.de
Wed Apr 2 11:10:27 CEST 2003
On Wed, 02, Apr 2003, Jasper Huijsmans wrote:
> >>>Looks fine to me. Please go ahead and commit that :)
> >>Done. Finally got around to it. I changed SIGHUP to SIGUSR1 at edscott's
> >Hm, I think SIGHUP is more common as a reload signal. Whats the point of
> >using SIGUSR1?
> Well, the reason is that the program receives a SIGHUP when X exits.
> There's no use trying to reload modules in that case. I don't have a
> strong opinion on this, though.
Ok, that looks reasonable.
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer
More information about the Xfce4-dev